We haven’t even had a second to check, but there’s probably venom dripping down the bathroom wall of the Internet right now. Geeks are probably scoffing and dismissing the “Hollywood Foreign Press” for being “foreigners!” and out of touch and god knows what other xenophobic epithets for mostly shutting out their beloved “The Dark Knight” by the 2008, 66th Annual Golden Globe nominations.
“The Dark Knight” was a juggernaut at the box-office, both in the U.S. and worldwide, but it scored one measly nomination for Heath Ledger, the one most of us sane, non-street-team people figured it would get. But some still believe ‘TDK’ is a Oscar contender, but the film and Christopher Nolan were totally shut out and we feel this will continue when Oscar comes around (Nolan himself has the best shot for another nod besides Heath; though yes, technical nominations aplenty). Even Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard failed to get an nomination for their thrilling and atonal score. Geeks are angry right now.
“Milk” was just lauded up and down yesterday by the most important U.S. critics, but it too was given only one lousy nomination for Sean Penn. Its director Gus Van Sant, its entire, very-strong supporting cast (including Josh Brolin) and the picture itself were totally shut out. Oops, Danny Boyle was nominated, we’re going too fast! Nevermind (*whistles out the room*).
If you thought the rest of the world would sympathize or understand the plight and scope of “Che” Guevara and Steven Soderbergh’s epic, forget it. Benicio del Toro might have won the Best Actor at Cannes, but again, he was cockblocked here. His Oscar chances must be unfortunately now seen as completely negligible. Another Best Actor hopeful left in the cold (again), was Josh Brolin. In September, many were calling him a sure-fire awards-season nominee, but it appears like this won’t happen (which is probably a good thing cause he was good, but not great). Clint Eastwood not earning himself a Best Actor nomination is probably viewed as a snub, but you can tell from our “Gran Torino” thoughts that we called that one at least a week ago when we finally saw it.
In the Best Actress category, poor Michelle Williams was left in the dark for her excellent turn in “Wendy & Lucy,” we pretty much figured, even though we prayed for it. Likewise, strong performances by Vera Farmiga and Kate Beckinsale in “Nothing But The Truth” were ignored. The biggest female shut-out at this point must be viewed as Melissa Leo in “Frozen River” who has a ton of U.S. praise. Not a total shocker, but Rosario Dawson’s startlingly good performance in “Seven Pounds” was also forgotten. Readers remind us that Cate Blanchett not receiving a nomination for ‘Ben Button’ must be viewed as a snub and they’re correct (especially when Brad Pitt got one and some were suggesting he was the weak link).
There’s a contingent of fruitcakes who think “Wall-E” can get into the Best Oscar Picture category and the Pixar animated cartoon was relegated to the Best Animated category where it will surely stay (thank god).
In the Best Supporting Actress category, the emotional and gut-wrenching turn by Evan Rachel Wood was overlooked for Marisa Tomei’s portrayal of a stripper in “The Wrestler.” Evidently one cancels out the others (though to be honest we’re not sure anyone was campaigning for her other than us). In the Foreign Film category, France’s Palm d’Or-winning feature, “The Class” didn’t make the cut and neither did strong contenders like “Let The Right One In” (Sweden), “Three Monkeys” (Turkey) and “Il Divo” (Italy).
The big surprises and perhaps ones that are an indication of Foreign taste were the four nominations for “The Reader,” and the three nominations for the underachieving “In Bruges,” but then again, the Globes have a comedy and or musical category where ‘Bruges’ picked up most of its nomination prizes and of course that category does not exist for Oscar. No one probably expected “Tropic Thunder” to score two acting nominations either. It’s cute and amusing that Tom Cruise got one, but there’s no way he has a shot at Oscar and anyone with two eyes that has to pick between Michael Shannon in “Revolutionary Road” (who also got snubbed in the Best Supporting category, which is outright poppycock!) and Robert Downey Jr., well, the choice is super obvious unless you’re completely blind or mentally retarded, frankly.
Lastly, it’s not a snub because no one else seems to care, but Eddie Marsan’s awe-inspiring performance in “Happy-Go-Lucky” as a repressed psychopath was overlooked. We championed all we could, but no one was ever in the tank as deeply for him as we were we don’t think. It’s shame. It’s still one our favorite performances of the year. Other performances, not necesarily snubbed, but worth a second glance at, is our Breakout and Breakthrough Performances of 2008 piece.
Who else do you think got snubbed? For once, we’re actively asking you to “sound off” (god we hate that term) in the comments section. Maybe we’ll even update our piece if we think you’re on the money.
Well, go ahead and throw Michael Shannon’s name on there too then. The one nom most people expected from Revolutionary Road was supporting actor, and instead it got all the others. Well you know…you saw it (jealous).
I might also add that Brad Pitt (who everyone expected would get snubbed) scored a nom while his counterpart, Cate Blanchett, did not (who everyone says is better than him in this). It can probably be chalked up to the tight actress race, so without having seen any of the movies besides The Changeling, I don’t think I can judge yet.
But you can’t really tell me Blanchett will go a year without getting nomed for something. Somehow it’ll happen…I think it’s in her contract.
And Michael Shannon aside, if they wanted to represent some comedy with their acting noms, they should’ve nomed Brad Pitt for Burn After Reading…he was much better than both the Tropic Thunder guys.
“Aren’t you worried about your secret shit?”
I’d agree with that, Pitt was better, though Cruise was pretty damn close. RDJ, well… pffft, overrated.
Oh, and hey…Danny Boyle was nomed for director. Just FYI…I see you even mentioned in the globes piece that you would have liked to see him nomed, right under his name that shows he was nomed.
Well I see that Fincher and Benjamin Buttons got a lot of love from the Golden Globes.
Hmmm…
That’s kind of strange given how much we’re told his movie sucks and all.
Wait, I just noticed…Ralph Fiennes was nomed for The Duchess? I thought he was supposed to get nomed for The Reader? Does this constitute a snub?? I would’ve rather seen him nomed for his best Ben Kingsley impression in In Bruges. There’s the snub. Thats a funny word…snub.
FincherFan you shit for brains. It’s ‘Benjamin Button,’ not ‘Buttons.’
Secondly, no one said it sucked. If you really think that you’re mentally deficient. Oh wait, nevermind.
In fact, Robert Downey Jr. gave a better comedic performance in Iron Man than Tropic Thunder, though that film wasn’t in the comedy category and his role was leading not supporting…still!
FincherFundamentalist Fanatic: Let me spell it out to you in plain chapter and verse so you’re no longer confused.
1. We chart the temperature of a film until we’ve seen it. We say critics are saying this________ (maybe it’s good, maybe it’s bad, maybe it’s mixed, etc.)
2. When we’ve seen it we either say, critics were right, dead-wrong or we disagree depending on how we honestly feel about the film.
That’s all there is to it. Ben Button has received good to mixed reviews, that’s plain as day. Some of them are glowing and some of them are it’s good, but and some are just not very good.
Yes, the majority is positive, but there’s enough, “it’s detached, it’s cold” caveats out there to give one pause and hesitation. That’s it. I know some movie fans like yourself and Dark Knight fans can only accept the positive, but sorry, we look at all angles of things.
If you think that’s unfair, well this is the wrong place to be. I’m sure there are other Fincher circle-jerk sites that you’d be much more comfortable at.
Weird set of nominations. If The Reader is half as bad as the book (had to read it my freshman year of college) then it’s terrible. Glad to see Franco nominated if only because it means he might do more comedy.
I just can’t get over The Reader’s dismal 58% on rottentomatoes. I don’t care what you say, poor critical reception will keep this off the map come Oscar time, unless of course it recovers by then once all the reviews are in. People have done the rottentomatoes connection before, but if I remember correctly, the lowest film to get a Best Pic nod recently was Cider House Rules with a 72% from 1999!
Strike that last post…it was Babel with a 68%…still 10% higher than what the Reader has now.
Sorry your film Che isn’t doing better, but…
Benjamin Buttons currently sits at 90% on Rotten Tomatoes. Those are “good to mixed” reviews I think most producers/studios/directors would love to have.
Can’t chat, off to participate in a circle-jerk.
Lates.
Umm, ok. Its well established that Che isn’t doing well critically (mixed) and during awards season it’s getting totally overlooked, for sure. I’ve written that several times and above.
The difference is though I’ve seen Che and Ben Button (as of last night), and you’re championing a film you’ve never seen. I’m very curious as to how Fincher fans are going to take to this one, it’s nothing like his other work and there are some Forest Gump like things to be sure. I wonder if that means Fincher fans will now like Forest Gump?
The girl i saw it did not like it at all and its supposed to be a romance.