Let’s be frank. The Toronto Intl. Film Festival has an unfortunate penchant for accepting mediocre films because of their marquee-worthy names and “Henry’s Crime,” is certainly one of those pictures (along with “Passion Play,” and “What’s Wrong With Virginia,” two films that we were duped into seeing only because of the talent involved).
Another hard fact of life we should know well by now: Keanu Reeves is a truly unremarkable actor and should just stick to his action-based instincts that don’t call on the actor to deliver anything outside his extremely limited range. That sad truth coupled with conventional, formulaic material and flat direction makes for a largely forgettable film experience.
Colorless and mostly devoid of animated moments, Malcolm Venville’s romantic comedy heist film “Henry’s Crime” is flat, rote and listless with few peaks and/or valleys (the director’s known for the poorly received “44 Inch Chest”).
The aforementioned wooden thespian stars as the eponymous Henry, a Buffalo-based tollbooth worker sleepwalking through life. His restless wife (Judy Greer) wants a baby, but Henry — clearly having some kind of existential crisis — doesn’t know what he wants out of life. Asked by his wife point blank if he still loves her, Henry can barely muster an authentic answer. Something is troubling this protagonist. And while we only rarely see glimpses of the cause, it seems, much like the picture at hand, he’s in desperate need of some kind of inspiration.
Suddenly, in the middle of baby talk over breakfast, two shady friends (Fischer Stevens and Danny Hoch) stop by asking Henry to suit up for a baseball game in the middle of November because one of their men is sick. It’s immediately clear that they need a driver for some kind of illegal action, but the dulled-by-life Henry only notices they’ve pulled up in front of a bank and the car has been hotwired when its too late (by the rule of light comedies we are apparently supposed to suspend our disbelief here).
An adroit bank security man (the great Bill Duke) spots the action going down and stops the duped Henry in the proverbial getaway car at gunpoint. Six months later, well into his three-year sentence for attempted armed robbery, Henry gets a visit from his wife who tells him she’s in love and the now-scruffy con seems genuinely content that she’s happy. Henry’s acclimation to prison is made easy by Max (James Caan in the film’s most worthwhile performance) and when he’s finally released, the purposeless man still comes to visit the spry old-timer.
Explaining the picture in full is complicated because of all the various elements, but it’s hardly dense. Henry soon becomes enamored by local actress Julie (a serviceable Vera Farmiga) and while visiting the local historical theater where’s she’s performing, comes across a newspaper clipping that reveals the auditorium once had a speakeasy in it during prohibition that was connected to the same bank via a poorly sealed underground tunnel (Peter Stormare plays the angry and perennially unsatisfied theater director with cliched enthusiasm).
Inspired, and feeling like he did the time, so he might as well do the crime, Henry hatches a plot to convince Max — all too content with living in prison, even though he could easily receive parole — to play nice to the review board, be freed, and help him out with his heist plan and thus the thrust of the picture finally comes into play (don’t worry, thus far this is all synopsis, first-act stuff).
From there, “Henry’s Crime” vacillates between romantic comedy (the Keanu/Farmiga relationship, though she’s aloof and icy) and the crime caper, both of which are tethered to the theater where Farmiga’s character is acting in Anton Chekov’s final play, “The Cherry Orchard” (which acts throughout as a way-too-obvious and spelled-out metaphor for Henry’s life as a man who must break free from his past and start a new future).
If Venville nails two things well in the picture they are capturing the bleak and depressing nature of Buffalo that could crush any tollbooth worker (or regular citizen’s) soul, and hiring music supervisor Blake Leyh who peppers the film with an awesome vintage soul-funk and afrobeat-laden soundtrack largely delivered by Sharon & The Dap Kings and The Budos Band (two bands that are new, but do an incredibly job of sounding like authentic ’70s deep cuts). Sadly, the music doesn’t really fit the tone of the picture, but at least good tunes do accompany the action.
Yet another film that will likely have distribution problems unless they can spin Keanu’s puzzling and still-somehow-relevant marquee value into a selling point, “Henry’s Crime,” isn’t worthless, just uninteresting, familiar and not particularly special.
While mildly diverting initially, the romcom-cum-crime film doesn’t have the goods to sustain its 108 minute running time. Perhaps if another actor, one with serious chops, had taken the lead and a more visionary director, one with an eye for stimuli and pulling great performances out of decent thespians, had been on board, Venville’s flick wouldn’t be completely flavorless and commonplace, but that point is moot. While not the greatest cinematic trespass committed this festival (and sadly there were lots of them), “Henry’s Crime” is a bland and mild offense that should be lumped in with other forgettable misdemeanors not worth doing filmgoing jail time over. [C-]
I disagree, Keanu Reeves can be good on occasion. Don't forget about Sam Raimi's The Gift; that's a truly effective performance on his part. He's also pretty good in My Own Private Idaho, and of course, the Bill and Ted movies. There is evidence of a good actor somewhere in there, it's just rarely tapped.
what the previous poster said. And let's not forget Reeves' performance in Thumbsucker and A Scanner Darkly and Street Kings- just to name a few more.
And if 44 Inch Chest was a poorly received film, that's not the film's fault 😉 Maybe it was just a case of a film/director not meeting the expectations and preconceptions of jaded reviewers 😉
Looking forward to see Henry's Crime. Even if only on DVD.
As one of the dozen or so people who actually saw 44 Inch Chest; trust me, it was the film's fault it was poorly received.
Reeves was good in Thumbsucker and mostly good in A Scanner Darkly, but it's just too far and few between.
And yeah, blame it on "jaded critics" or whatever other excuses you want. Best of luck to you.
The grade here is also very kind.
well, then add another person to the dozen or so who actually saw 44 Inch Chest.
then again, it's all a matter of perception 😉
[…] whatever other excuses you want. Best of luck to you.
oh, why so serious? 😉
So if I don't agree with your opinions I'm dismissed?
well, best of luck to you too 🙂
I got tired of reading that Keanu Reeves is no de Niro or any other actor. I wonder why critics used to look at him that way only, persistently trying to find his inferiority, faults etc. ? They used to concentrate on it ad nausea. I know it is very difficult to dispose of cliché, mantra about this or that, but can we try once to forget about what we knew for certain (?) and look without prejudice? Without upfront thesis that there must be something wrong because Keanu Reeves is involved? Stop trying to justify this standpoint by using very specific prism, severe and critical (much more than we use to others), while watching him.
When we start watching Keanu Reeve’s film, can we honestly say that our attitude is exactly the same as to any other film/actor?
I saw this film in New York on Monday evening, and found it quite entertaining.
I thought Keanu was spot on as Henry, a man so disillusioned with life that he appears almost robotic when first introduced. Vera Farmiga, as the feisty, take no prisoners, Julie was an absolutely perfect counterpart to Henry. James Caan rounds out the trio as a charming con man who is perfectly content to finish out his days in prison which he refers to as his "home". The chemistry between Caan and Reeves works very well in this film.
I disagree that Keanu is irrelevant as an actor. He has turned in some highly impressive performances – My Own Private Idaho and Feeling Minnesota both come to mind.
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, finding the dry humor and subtle romance to be perfectly balanced. I highly recommend seeing it.
Some critics seems to love to Keanu bash, no matter what the film. I've
seen plenty of other "actors" can't
act a lick, but I don't read about
them getting condemned as much as Reeves. Actually, Keanu was superb
in The Gift and some other films as well. He's not as bad an actor as
these wannabes/critics (and where
does one get a degree in movie critiques anyway?)love to point out. People aren't stupid and if
Keanu was as bad as these snobs would have one believe, he wouldn't be so successful, would he? But, then again, the "critics" most likely assume we have no taste …
Screw 'em.
forgettable???
the film is actually good. keanu doin that character fits. and he does it good even with his frozen face. and the music fits! the grand thing about it: the film is NOT overloaded, filtered, cut into tiny pieces and whatsoever. with smoothness and relaxation it tells a clever story (and I dont mean the coup) and does it bloody right.
and has an even better end.
the end.