Thursday, January 23, 2025

Got a Tip?

‘The Book Thief’ Screenwriter Disappointed By Fox’s Changes To Script, Desire For Family-Friendly Film

The Book Thief

While it was momentarily an awards season contender thanks solely to studio-willed exposure, WWII drama “The Book Thief” nonetheless sputtered out upon its US release, never quite connecting with critics or fans of the best-selling book by Markus Zusak. As the Oscars played out this past weekend with only John Williams’ score gaining a nod, a post-mortem was inevitable—and now the films screenwriter has spoken up first.

Following a young German girl (played by Sophie Nelisse) who retreats into a world of books after her neglectful foster parents shelter a young Jewish man during WWII, “The Book Thief” faltered, in our opinion, underneath its director Bryan Percival’s earnest, soft-handed approach. And in a new interview with the film’s screenwriter Michael Petroni, he revealed that his initial draft of the film was a much darker affair than the version that ended up onscreen.

“My major disappointment with the rewrites was that they took out most of the magic realism that features in the book,” he said. “Fox wanted a film that would appeal to families, not just adults, and Brian wanted to tell more of a straight, dramatic tale.”

Petroni first wrote his draft seven years ago for Fox, where it sat until producer Karen Rosenfelt raised the funds needed to make it a reality. Finally grossing $21.5 million in the US and $61.6 worldwide, the film’s reception is undoubtedly a disappointment for those who weathered its long journey. At least the studio can count on Australia, though, or perhaps the local appeal of Geoffrey Rush – it’s taken in $13.5 million there since its release in January. [Inside Film]

About The Author

Related Articles

2 COMMENTS

  1. The facts of this article are wrong. Especially in the short description of the movie. Her foster parents were FAR from neglectful. I feel that if you are going to write an article on a movie, you should at least WATCH the movie first. Poor journalism.

  2. Perhaps if you had actually read the full Inside Film article instead of cutting and pasting the only quote which seemingly supports your story, you would see the film was not “undoubtedly a disappointment for those who weathered its long journey.” As the publisher of IF, I find it very disappointing when other media outlets use our work to bolster what is ultimately poor journalism. The quote you have pulled from Don Groves’ article is completely out of context and has tainted what is actually a positive, and more importantly, factually correct piece.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img
Stay Connected
0FansLike
19,300FollowersFollow
7,169FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles