Reboot, reboot, blah blah blah reboot. Or to translate, after Warner Bros’ version of “Sherlock Holmes” for whatever we’re calling this new decade (Is there a memo we didn’t get? The Teens? The Tenties?) proved a hit both critically and commercially, studios are clearly on the lookout for other out-of-copyright literary properties that can be turned into sexy action movies. Warners are now developing a new version of “The Three Musketeers,” with former executive, and “Sherlock” producer, Lionel Wigram shepherding the project.
Peter Straughan, writer of the recent “The Men Who Stare At Goats” will adapt Alexandre Dumas’ novels “The D’Artagnan Romances” (made up of “The Three Musketeers,” “Twenty Years After” and “The Vicomte of Bragelonne”), in a manner that Variety says “will play up the action and sexier elements of the story much the same way that Wigram… reimagined the detective as a bare-knuckle boxing, martial-arts savvy sleuth molded by Robert Downey Jr.”
Aside from Richard Lester’s enjoyable 1973 take on the material, which spawned two sequels, Dumas’ novel hasn’t fared well in its recent cinematic adaptations, from Stephen Herek’s 1993 “Young Guns”-influenced take, to the mediocre “The Man In The Iron Mask” and Peter Hyams’ disastrous “The Musketeer,” so a fresh take could theoretically be fun, and “Sherlock Holmes” was far more enjoyable than we were expecting. But then, both Herek and Hyams’ versions were ‘fresh takes,’ so, you know… No cast or director are yet attached – Taylor Lautner for D’Artagnan! Paul W.S. Anderson, director of “Resident Evil,” is also developing a 3-D take on the books, which we dearly hope never gets made.
if they go back to the novels it might not be so bad.
but you have the wrong twi-kid. they will use Robert. more dashing and rebel looking. with Harry, Ron and Draco as the 3Ms. with all the Twihards and the Potterites to supply the box office it will be the hit of the century
"Reboot: The Movie" soon in a theater near you.
Come what may, I'll always have the dumb but ridiculously entertaining 1993 Disney version. It's well-cast (it was the first time this young moviegoer ever saw Oliver Platt), genuinely spirited, and – for a PG-rated family adventure – violent as hell. It's actually aged quite well. Plus, this new version can't be any worse than The Musketeer.