At the midway point of "Taken 3," there is a visible moment when everyone involved with this half-hearted sequel has decided to go through the motions. In pursuit of a bad guy through the winding hills of Malibu, the inexhaustible Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) has his car rammed from behind and pushed over a precipitous edge, where it tumbles end over end over end before exploding in a gigantic fireball that would nominally kill whoever was behind the wheel. But just a few minutes later, Mills has not only survived without a scratch, but has clambered up back to the road, hijacked a car, made his way to the nearest town, finds the guys who inconvenienced his ride, and promptly dispatches them in a liquor store.
The above is not a spoiler, but simply an indication that nothing in "Taken 3" matters. While Mills was indestructible in the first two movies, there was at least a semblance of stakes, with the lives of his daughter and wife in the balance. With those threats removed in "Taken 3," which flips the script as Mills turns from hunter into hunted, there is not much to do but grimly grip the armrests of your theater seat and just ride out whatever incomprehensibly dull or silly thing happens next.
In the event you do want to know what the meagre plot is all about, I’ll fill you. Essentially, Mills receives a text from his ex-wife Lenore (Famke Janssen) one morning, urging him to meet at his apartment so they can have bagels and talk. Mills, an honorable man who also likes bagels, retrieves them from a local café and promptly returns home. Don’t forget about those fresh bagels because they will be an important clue, but anyway, Mills’ Special Skills Sense starts tingling as soon as he walks in the door, and before he can get the cream cheese out, he discovers his ex-wife dead on his bed, her throat slit, then notices two cops at his back with their guns drawn. It’s a set up! But Mills makes quick work of the beat cops, and goes on the run, eager to prove his innocence. But where Richard Kimble was just a regular doctor caught in a tough spot in "The Fugitive," in "Taken 3," Mills is able to retreat to a safe house and grab a stash that includes guns, clothing and high tech gear, plus he’s got his golfing crew of ex-special agents to help him out. There is no doubt about the outcome, so why bother getting too worked up about it?
The script from producer and co-writer Luc Besson (who apparently needed to intellectually and creatively meld minds with Robert Mark Kamen to create this airless actioner) simply has Mills going from one place to another, attempting to figure out the machinations of the undercooked and poorly conceived conspiracy around him. Hot on his tail is cop Franck Dotzler (Forest Whitaker), who enjoys carrying a chess piece around for no apparent reason and constantly pulls at an elastic band around his wrist. I think both of those affectations were methods Whitaker used to keep himself awake or to prevent him from thinking too much about the plot, because if Mills and Dotzler would’ve taken a moment to talk to each other and examine the case from all angles, they would’ve cracked it in ten minutes. Certainly, it’s not a great brain tease to figure out who the Big Bad is in the movie, as there’s only five major characters in the film, and one of them is played by the aforementioned Janssen. RIP.
Okay, so the "Taken" films have never been cerebrally rigorous, but if you came looking for action, may I remind you that bagels provide a crucial moment of realization for Dotzler. Olivier Megaton, who has forged a career of never living up to his amazing surname, directs inasmuch as he’s the guy behind the camera who indicates when the actors should move and talk and when they shouldn’t. He’s a lot more excited when guns are firing, dudes are getting punched or people are getting chased, so much so that he can’t hold the camera still, and the poor editors (it took the team of Audrey Simonaud and Nicolas Trembasiewicz to patch this together) are left to make the action sequences coherent. So the greatest special effect in the movie is how seamlessly Simonaud and Trembasiewicz cut together Neeson and his stunt double.
You might think from this review that "Taken 3" is already a candidate for one of the worst movies of 2015 —if only. Sadly, the sequel isn’t even so bad as to be memorable. Instead, it’s vaporous, not even possessing the qualities indicating that anyone involved cared about any detail of the film. Even the title itself seems lazy, as no one taken against their will this time around. In fact, it’s the audience’s time and money that gets snatched, and not even Bryan Mills, with all his special skills, can stop that from happening. [D]
Taken 3 is wicked ✌️ not as good as the first though but I went to see it with my husband and my daughter they both loved it aswell
I went to see this last night with my wife and two sons in their twenties. Ok, it is not a gripping thriller the way the first two were, but it is still good action – packed entertainment, and very good value for money, if like us, you live in Bridgwater, Somerset, UK and can see it in your local cinema for under 5 pounds sterling each!
Blah blah blah!
Also, as I nearly forgot – this is a Kevin review without any comments toward spelling mistakes/etc. – I don\’t know whether to take that as a sign of people caring less about the movie and thus not bothering to read the review thoroughly or not.
Such a weird implication to have from the second film, where Bryan Mills seems to be rekindling his romance with his soon to be divorced for the second time ex-wife and then, just randomly they insert veteran cut-and-paste actor Dougray Scott into the film as her latest love interest. It\’s almost like they didn\’t give a shit about keeping any sense of continuity and just wanted to try and make money from a third film or something… Hollywood, who knew amirite?
One of the worst movies of the year. Taken should have stopped after the first film. Finishing on a high note is so much more satisfying.
@Gerard
>not as good as the first obviously threequels
So you\’re saying last sausage from the factory isn\’t as good as the first one.
We developed a taste, didn\’t we?
All sarcasm aside, this is not against you Gerard as I don\’t know you.
But there is something that I want to get out of my system.
The new taken is only a movie because it is technically shot on film.
It\’s not a movie it\’s just \’moving images\’ (for a lack of better term).
Granted it could please a certain audience.
Like silly cartoons with flashy colors could please your two years old.
Because those are not movies they are usually critics proof: no matter what the movies critics say about the last Michael Bay opus, people will flock in droves.
Because they\’re in for the \’moving images\’.
There should be two kind of reviews:
– review for movies: full on thoughtful essay about the work.
– review for \’moving images\’: clearly states that the current work was not intended to be a movie, fails to develop any stake or emotional connection to the story/character and is targeted to an audience with a specific set of taste (the two years olds with buying power).
In three lines of text.
Tops.
And use the rest of the review to write an *entertaining* piece on another subject.
At the end of the year, I would like to see the \’moving images\’ having their own top 10 list or award (not the razzie though).
Also it would be nice to be able not to file Michael Bay, Megaton and Mc G. in the same occupation as Scorcese, Kurosawa, PT Anderson etc.
Or spot the exact time Luc Besson stopped directing movies and went fabricating \’moving images\’.
i went to see TAKEN 3 tonight loved it not as good as the first obviously threequels never are but still enjoyable
i have no interest in seeing this film, and I always enjoy your reviews/essays. Just wanted to mention that snapping a rubber band on your wrist is a very soft culture tony robbins sort of thing to help control anxiety.
OMG, this sounds AWESOME! The dumber, the better.