“Salt,” the new Phillip Noyce-directed spy thriller, features Angelina Jolie as a covert CIA operative named Evelyn Salt who is accused of being a Russian spy. For the next ninety minutes or so, we watch as she dashes, ducks, climbs out of buildings, detonates bombs and engages in high-speed pursuits, all in an incredibly guilty-looking attempt to clear her name. The biggest problem with “Salt” lies in its unflagging intent: it’s so interested in the chase that it never gives us a reason to be emotionally invested… or even curious.
The beginning of “Salt,” which had to be replayed about five times at our disaster-prone screening, shows our leading lady being tortured in a North Korean military base. Without any connective tissue, we then see her being led out of the camp, bruised and bloody. She sees her handler, Ted Winter (Liev Schreiber), who would usually be one to just let a single agent die. He explains that it wasn’t him that made the plea, it was Jolie’s nerdy German bug scientist boyfriend Mike (August Diehl, aka General Hellstrom, the guy who blew Michael Fassbender’s cover in “Inglourious Basterds”).
One supposes that we’re supposed to be invested in Salt’s relationship with this guy, as we immediately cut to several years later. She is living with the nerdy bug scientist guy, and they are celebrating their wedding anniversary in fact. But thinks take a turn for the worse when a Russian named Orlov (Daniel Olbrychski) comes into CIA offices claiming that, as part of an incredibly convoluted program, there are several sleeper agents waiting to be activated in America. And the name of one of the sleeper agents? Evelyn Salt! Dum…Dummmm…DUMMMMM!
Soon, a counter intelligence agent (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is convinced that she is the culprit and starts in on a dogged pursuit, the Tommy Lee Jones to her Harrison Ford. Except way duller. From there it’s one long chase. Periodically, things are broken up by hastily edited flashback sequences, either to Salt’s earlier spy work (she started seeing the nerdy German bug guy as part of an operation) or to her life as a child. At some point, maybe we missed it in all the poorly choreographed commotion, Salt just becomes that Russian spy (this isn’t giving anything away since it happens pretty early and, really, there’s no other way for the paper-thin story to progress). She goes to a Russian stronghold and might as well fist-bump her other sleeper agent comrades.
At this point things just become so ludicrous that you cease even being mildly curious about the movie. By the time the credits roll, which should be preceded by a title card reading “TO BE CONTINUED” there’s so little resolution, it has all become a blur: the Russian agents’ intentions, what Salt was trying to do (and what her motivations were), and how anything this callous, calculated and cynical could actually sway anyone to watch this thing.
Even though the movie was originally written for Tom Cruise, (under the title “Edwin Salt”) they’ve swung things in the opposite direction to an almost laughable degree. Watch, as Salt kicks off her high heels! Marvel as she covers up a snooping security camera with pantyhose! Gasp as she uses a maxi-pad as a bandage, covering up a bullet wound that never gives her any trouble ever again! She is woman! Hear her roar! (She doesn’t really roar. That would be too interesting a character trait.)
The kind of invincible feats of derring-do that Salt perpetrates suggest some kind of invincible superhero, but the movie is filmed in a rough, hand-held style, with the color pallet consisting of Cold War blues and grays, and accompanied by an atrocious James Newton Howard hard-rock-ish score. The film’s main touchstone is obviously the “Bourne” movies, but “Salt” is too superficial, too concerned with the mechanics of the chase instead of the tormented soul of the protagonist, for anything to ever stick, emotionally or viscerally. Also, recent activity notwithstanding, the whole Russian aspect seems terribly dated and sad. Like everything else about “Salt,” it’s undercooked, half-assed and could use a whole lot more seasoning. [D-]
it has 80% at RT nad 73 metacritic, i would say it a good movie and will see it.
Hahahahahaha!!!! You're tittle is so funny, should I give you a medal?! Or did you steal it from some other site again?
You caught us! There is no way anyone could ever think of making a salt and pepper joke with that movie title!
Those critics who hate Seagal movies but give Salt passing grades must be the worst kind of snobs ever, because this is totally a Seagal movie.
Terrible fucking movie. @SMNP, it's your money to throw away.
"the whole Russian aspect seems terribly dated and sad" – yeah, Russian sleeper agents are such an old story. Its not like Russia still sends agents to live undercover in the USA today.
Do you even read the news?
I'm shocked, shocked! that a Playlist reviewer doesn't like a mainstream Hollywood thriller! What is this world coming to?
Wow, that was a terrible movie. Noyce doing cheesy 90s action Noyce meets Bourne with terrible results. Not sure what Angelina Jolie was thinking.
poor poor Chiwetel Ejiofor.
why is he doomed to appear in fairly innocuous shit movies, wont someone please cast him in another great film like "dirty pretty things"??
2012…
Salt..
Next up is some video game adaption???
He either needs a new agent or has a shit load of debt to pay off!!
What a sexist review. This writer has some other issues besides not liking this movie – the review is just too over the top with venom to be credible.
Is it sexist just because it's an action film staring a woman and it got a bad review, or…?
I think what you are missing is the implied quotations surrounding the third paragraph detailing the woman-specific trickery that Angelina is forced to enact.
Also: what is with all the people reading The Playlist, and obviously doing it enough that they have picked up on a general sarcastic, critical tone, and then getting invested enough in their disapproval of this tone, not to stop reading the site but, instead, writing a comment making note of this tone.
Oh, and @originalityisourfriend, it's "your", not "you're".
I have to say it reads like you went in with the mindset of looking for things to dislike, like you have an ax to grind. It's a pure popcorn movie guys, lighten up.
OK, so the plot is far-fetched and you didn't like the score but while you managed to comment about a woman having to remove her high heels to run, no comment on how Noyce directed the action sequences? (One of the main selling points) Or about Jolie's performance? (the other main selling point) "undercooked, half-assed and could use a whole lot more seasoning" could apply to your review as well.
Not really sure why there is small group of defenders of this movie. Drew's review is spot on; this is one of the silliest movies I've seen in a while.
The reason Drew didn't talk about the action sequences is that they are completely generic and forgettable. No amount of handicam could save how dull they were. And there is one sequence ripped straight from "The Bourne Ultimatum."
Not even going to get into the climax which keeps going on and on thanks to computers programs that are constantly loading and authenticating.
The whole movie is a buildup to a sequel that will never happen.
The Playlist loves a good popcorn movie, but this one really isn't it.
Also, to reiterate, as far as Seagal movies, this is more like Fire Down Below than Hard To Kill.
Roger Ebert gave Salt FOUR stars! http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100721/REVIEWS/100729997
It's going to KILL at the box office.
Read it and weep!
And it killing at the box-office makes it a good movie? Lol.
someone compared "salt" to "Eagle eyes" and it seems there is a hilarious scene when Salt dresses up man!
i don't see the movie(it's in the end of august in my country) but the trailer was generic ,Jolie's wigs were awful and she's too gaunt to be credible in my opinion
i still like angie, nevertheless.