Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Got a Tip?

The Essentials: David Cronenberg’s Best Films

null“A Dangerous Method” (2011)
David Cronenberg is not just an auteur — he’s a dynamic storyteller, something can shine through even when he’s tacking films that do not at first blush appear to be within his auteurist wheelhouse. In “A Dangerous Method,” he employs all of that flair, twisting and tweaking the structure of this curious psychodrama in ways no other director would approach. Depicting the professional tensions between Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender) and his mentor Sigmund Freud (Viggo Mortensen), and Jung’s flirtation with student/patient Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley), he juxtaposes the straight-laced nervousness of Jung, the cigar-chewing (natch) boldness of Freud and the bedroom dysfunction of the genuinely tortured Spielrein. But he’s also having a wry laugh at the proceedings, depicting Freud as a psychological bully who treats everyone as his test subjects, and Jung as the whimsical genius who starts to credit his own mind-powers almost as a reflexive response to Freud’s subtle bullying. “A Dangerous Method” divided Cronenberg fans who couldn’t grasp where it settled on the spectrum between starchy, talky period film and kinky Cronenbergian sexual melodrama. But once again, he is exploring the horrors of the body (Jung is almost repulsed by his own longings) in a way both subtle and perversely overt. Whether that synthesis spices up a conventional, talky period drama, or simply renders the film less successful as a period drama, is an ongoing debate, as is Knightley’s physical, gurning performance. It’s a hard film to adore, but an impossible one to dismiss: perhaps appreciating its strengths from an appropriately analytical remove is the only right answer. [B]

null“Cosmopolis” (2012)
After the comparatively mainstream one-two punch of “A History of Violence” and “Eastern Promises,” “Cosmopolis” both is and isn’t a return to the Canadian body horror auteur’s more transgressive roots. To be sure, this opaque, occasionally frustrating adaptation of Don DeLillo’s steel-edged novel is anything but mainstream, featuring proctology exams conducted in limousines, resentful protesters brandishing dead rats in city streets and, in the final stretch of the film, some truly gruesome Cronenbergian violence. And yet, while the director has always employed a sort of clinical remove from his characters, his view of this movie’s central protagonist – Eric Packer, played with a minimal affectations and a disarming, ghostly pallor by Robert Pattinson in what many consider to be his first respectable role – is practically anemic, even lifeless at points. Packer spends the film’s runtime crawling across a vaguely apocalyptic New York City in a limo on his way to a haircut, and the character fits in snugly with the archetypical Cronenberg antihero. He’s morose, cynical, enthralled by sex, death and technology. Pattinson commits to his character’s non-identity admirably, although the hermetically congealed alternate universe in which “Cosmopolis” unfolds is ultimately more distancing than compelling. It isn’t until the film’s haunting third act, which features a mesmerizing scene set in Packer’s favorite childhood barbershop and the murderous advances of a disgruntled blue-collar nut named Benno Levin (Paul Giamatti, grizzled and shouting quite a bit) that “Cosmopolis” hints at the great, daring satire that it might have been. DeLillo die-hards may dig it, and fans of Cronenberg’s should give it a go just for curiosity’s sake, but sadly, “Cosmopolis” is a far cry from the director’s great, early work. [C]

Maps To The Stars“Maps to the Stars” (2014)
Tinseltown has never seemed more rancid then in “Maps to the Stars”, a fiendish, mostly brilliant and thoroughly off-putting Hollywood ghost story.  Cronenberg’s career making movies is going on four decades now, touching on everything from low-budget body horror to operatic period pieces, beat generation adaptations and straight-up crime films, and his signature brand of chilling alien deadness remains one of the most singularly disorienting cinematic experiences one can be exposed to. He remains typically fascinated with the human body as a horror show but this time around, he’s more taken with the literal possibilities of incest and the metaphysical aspects of death and love. “Maps” opens on a young, boyish-looking woman (Mia Wasikowska) on a Greyhound bus headed for Hollywood, California. She wears a hooded sweater that reads “Bad Babysitter” and has horrible burn marks on her neck and long, svelte black gloves covering her arms. Who is she? Without giving too much away, she’s involved in an Ouroboric tangle between some truly hideous, fucked-up people, all of whom we will come to know entirely too well. Julianne Moore lends her proclivity for scenery-chewing to the marvellous, hideously lived-in role of Havana Segrand, a pathetic has-been starlet whose bouts of prescription pill abuse and deviant sex are fueled by her unerring desire to embody the spirit of her mother by starring in the film that made her famous (Havana’s mother was burned in a fire, not a coincidence). Also in the mix are Benji Weiss (Ethan Bird), a vile, hateful child actor and the star of the “Bad Babysitter” franchise, a dim-bulb chauffeur with misguided authorial aspirations (Robert Pattinson) and a self-help guru named Stafford (John Cusack) who privately stews in concealed resentment and rage before disguising it as New Age doublespeak. This is an art film with the soul of a midnight movie, as mordantly funny and brazenly disturbing as Cronenberg was in his prime. [B+]

What’s your take on the many phases of Cronenberg’s career? Let us know in the comments.  — Jessica Kiang, Nicholas Laskin, the Playlist Staff.

About The Author

Related Articles

9 COMMENTS

  1. I am a big fan of Cronenberg. I have seen almost all of his films (just "Stereo" and "Maps to the Stars" are left to complete the list). I have also read "Cronenberg on Cronenberg" book, that really shed a light on the background of these films and the director.

    I agree with most of the reviews here, very good insights. I do also think that "Videodrome" was probably the best Cronenberg film ever made (so much technophobia and technophilia at the same time, very McLuhan-inspired media perception as well). Only few notes:

    eXistenZ is underrated film in my opinion. Considering the new renaissance of virtual reality, this film is even more relevant today. Cronenberg\’s vision is accurate to the uncanny level (of course if you take the body-horror part as a metaphor). For someone involved in games and virtual reality – this is one of the best films in ever made.

    I was also very glad to see "Cosmopolis", felt much more Cronenbergian than the three previous films. While maybe it is not one of the best films of his, but it is still great. It is a good reflection of today\’s new-rich, who are often very young entrepreneurs who have good programming and math skills and use their new technology to play in the old world systems and win. The film did have more potential than it managed to fulfill.

    Thank you for this article!

  2. Both Maps to the Stars and Cosmopolis are Fresh on Rottentomaotes, which means a majority of critics liked both films. MTTS is a brilliant film, and the one that Julianne Moore deserved her Oscar for. She won the Palm d\’Or at Cannes as Best Actress for Maps, and many other awards. It\’s a far superior film to Still Alice, and 20 years from now, Maps will be revered while Still Alice is viewed as a glorified Lifetime TV movie. I also agree that the rating of C for the already highly rated Cosmopolis doesn\’t make any sense now. If anything, it gets better with age.

  3. Wonder why Cosmopolis got a good reviews from The Playlist/Indiwire critics like E.Kohn(B),A.Thompson(A-),N.M.Smith(B-)J.Kiang(B+)D.Taylor(B+)and suddenly it gets C.This movie was one the bests movies of 2012.

  4. I never understand why David is consistently overlooked? You look at lists of philosophy driven films and never see any of his films listed? You look at lists of great visual film makers who make intelligent art and you see hacks like Nolan who make M Night Shameathon style one message movies: scene 1 motivation Bruce Willis is Dead, Scene 2 motivation Bruce Willis is Dead, Scene 3 motivation Bruce Willis is Dead, Reveal Bruce Willis is dead, they get listed, Cronenberg refuses to beat dead horses to a pulp so he\’s not on the list? Cronenberg continually being ignored by film watchers is proof that film is not an intellectual art form and that our culture in the Americas is symbolically retarded. If you look at his discography he has made more consistently great films than people like Paul Anderson yet doesn\’t get 1/100 of the credit or mention for doing so? Film watchers are illiterate your supposed to read film just like a book it is a medium of interpretation of symbols. Funny how people who can\’t read words don\’t go near books but people who can\’t read metaphors think they are experts on visual art? Critics consistently can not understand his vision that is a clear sign of true auteur genius because critics are ignorant of symbolism and too lazy to read up on film theory so in its place seek familiar settings and reliance on drama aka boring movies for stupid morons. Hey critics your in the wrong theater if you want to see a play. I agree totally with David on Nolan. Nolan proves film goers are drooling brain dead zombies I saw theaters pact full of anti Bush politics people dying to watch and cheer on George W in a hooded tux called Dark Knight. That film was seriously offensive and overly blatant in its right wing propaganda and government apologetics. They should have had the tag line \”You would like it If Batman did it.\” Basically proving idiots will accept anything including the violation of their rights if the person doing the violating is perceived cool enough. Inception was a complete rip off of What Dreams May Come with out any of the emotional content and so boring I thought I was watching a sequel to the Titanic, Memento as I already stated is just a dead horse beat in reverse not exactly a genius move, yet it has gotten him mention on every list? Naked Lunch is a master piece and the only mention it gets from movie blowers is its too weird and incoherent, from people who gave Happy Feet 10 stars on IMDB a complete piece of plagiarisms compiled into one big dung heap.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img
Stay Connected
0FansLike
19,300FollowersFollow
7,169FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles