80.” Philomena” (2013)
British director Stephen Frears has a few truly brilliant films under his belt, but as is often the case it’s not his best films (bar “Dangerous Liaisons,” which was last century) that have netted him the most recognition. “Philomena,” his account of a woman’s odyssey to find the son she’d been cruelly separated from by the nuns in the Irish convent where she’d been forced to do her penance for having a child out of wedlock, is not top-tier Frears, but with a ridiculously touching performance from an on-form Judi Dench at its heart, we’d take it over “The Queen” any day.
79. “Little Miss Sunshine” (2006)
It’s become emblematic of a certain strain of twee, Sundance-y film, but Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris‘ “Little Miss Sunshine” perhaps deserves a little more respect as the film that, more than any other, felt like it paved the way for smaller indies to nose their way into the Best Picture race. Also, it has Alan Arkin in it, and remembering that fact stops us from staying mad at it for any length of time.
78. “American Beauty” (1999)
Time has not been kind to the legacy of then-wunderkind Sam Mendes‘ blackly satirical swipe at middle-class American masculinity in crisis, but while there’s no doubt everyone went a little excessively cuckoo for it when it first came out, perhaps the backlash is also disproportionate. It does still boast a defining central role for Kevin Spacey, while Annette Bening and Chris Cooper (especially) are pretty great too. Always hated that up-itself plastic bag though.
77. “An Education” (2009)
Even if Lone Scherfig‘s sensitive adaptation (from a Nick Hornby script) of Lynn Barber‘s confessional memoir had only introduced us to the considerable talents of Carey Mulligan, it would have been worthwhile. But actually it does a fair bit more than that — injecting a healthy dose of unsentimental self-critique into an often overly romanced and nostalgic genre. It’s not the most urgent of stories, but it’s a surprisingly bracing and engaging little drama nonetheless.
76. “Fences” (2016)
Denzel Washington’s first two directorial features were a bit dull, but it would have been hard for him to mess up a piece of material as good (or one that he knew so well, having starred in it on Broadway) as August Wilson’s “Fences.” It’s far from the most inventive stage-to-screen translation ever, but it doesn’t matter so much when the script, and across-the-board performances (not just the Oscar-bound Washington and Viola Davis but the entire ensemble) are this good.
75. “Babel” (2006)
Now a two-time Best Director winner, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu had his first major brush with Oscar with this odd, uneven, fitfully effective film showing the interlinked shockwaves from a bullet fire across four countries. There’s really good stuff here — the Japanese section with Rinko Kikuichi is the best, and Brad Pitt’s rarely been better than he is here — but it doesn’t quite add up to a satisfying whole, and ends up feeling like a lesser cousin of “Amores Perros” and “21 Grams.”
74. “Up In The Air” (2009)
Jason Reitman’s third film isn’t quite as fresh-feeling as “Juno” was, but it’s still a comedy of rare maturity and feeling. Following George Clooney’s deliberately solitary human resources consultant (he fires people) and his young right hand woman (Anna Kendrick in a star-making turn), it’s a deceptively political, well-made movie that doesn’t completely add up, but moves and entertains while it’s going on, and has aged pretty well since release.
73. “Hidden Figures” (2016)
The term “crowd-pleaser” usually comes across as a backhanded compliment, particularly in an Oscar-movie context, but would that most crowd-pleasers pleased the crowds as effectively as “Hidden Figures.” The story of the three African-American woman whose role at NASA has long been overlooked, Theodore Melfi’s film is warm-hearted, consistently entertaining and, while not reinventing the wheel, elevated by a trio of absolutely tremendous performances by Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer and Janelle Monae.
72. “Slumdog Millionaire” (2008)
The curse of the Best Picture winner is that it paints a great big target on your back, and critics and cinephiles who might have otherwise had a perfectly good time with your movie become consumed entirely with hatred for it. Danny Boyle’s “Slumdog Millionaire” is one of them: a film with issues — it’s fairly disposable and formulaic, and takes a strangely glamorizing view of poverty — but also one with a dazzling energy and an often ingenious script. It’s hard to imagine a more fitting winner of the first Best Picture of the Obama era.
71. “The Sixth Sense” (1999)
The film that built M. Night Shyamalan’s career, “The Sixth Sense” was at the time, and still is, defined by its twist, which overshadows the rest of the film to a large extent. We’d argue that “Unbreakable,” “Signs” and “The Village” are all in some ways more interesting and rich films, but none are as entirely effective as this, which has a fascinating, mournful tone to its supernatural thrills, and great turns from its two leads (and arguably the best work of Willis’ career in some ways).
70. “Gosford Park” (2001)
The costume drama, in which a British stately home sets the stage for upstairs/downstairs class intrigue, murderous shenanigans and/or stifled love affairs, has always been catnip to the Academy, so it’s not surprising that when Robert Altman turned his hand to the genre, attracting a typically blistering ensemble, it picked up seven Oscar nominations. It only won for Julian Fellowes‘ screenplay, and it’s far from the greatest of the great director’s films, but it’s enjoyably intricate, even if it feels a little like a victory lap.
69. “Sideways” (2004)
Alexander Payne has released four movies this century, and three of them have been nominated for Best Picture (place your bets now on the 2018 lineup featuring his next film “Downsizing“). Of those, the most enduring and most inherently Payne-ful, is “Sideways” which features a definingly brilliant Paul Giamatti as the ultimate wine snob going on a tour of California vineyards and failing to learn very much about life and love (with Virginia Madsen) along the way.
68. “Letters From Iwo Jima” (2006)
Clint Eastwood‘s terse, serious directorial style can often feel like it lacks nuance, so it stands to reason that one of his better films would come from him deliberately positioning himself outside of his American wheelhouse. Especially compared to companion film “Flags of our Fathers” which takes the much more familiar tack, “Letters from Iwo Jima” is a surprisingly insightful and sympathetic portrait of “the enemy”: the Japanese WWII soldiers engaged in the titular campaign.
67. “127 Hours” (2010)
Danny Boyle is a remarkably flexible director, who works across multiple genres and budgets and almost always turns in something interesting in each. “127 Hours,” his single-location true story in which canyoneer Aron Ralston (James Franco) gets trapped in a chasm and ultimately must cut his own arm off to escape, is a fine example of him scaling right down and yet making a movie that is dynamic and involving, when in any other hands it could have been a thought experiment.
66. “Inglourious Basterds” (2010)
What’s that? Oh, the sound of a hundred toys being thrown from a hundred prams that we’ve dared to place Quentin Tarantino’s revisionist WWII revenge flick this far off the top spot. Well, deal with it, QT stans: while “Inglourious Basterds” might be a frequently amusing exploitation fantasy and while Christoph Waltz is so good we can almost forgive him for playing this exact same character ever since, the film is just not smart or incisive enough to earn its self-servingly cavalier attitude toward history.
65. “Argo” (2012)
The Academy loves: actors turned directors; true stories; movies about moviemaking, especially when the fimmaking process is portrayed as somehow heroic. And so “Argo,” from director Ben Affleck, telling the true story of a hostage rescue that happened under cover of a fictional film shoot, was always going to ring a lot of bells. But its Best Picture success is not just about box-ticking: it’s a well-made, engaging film that does however pose the question of what the hell happened to Affleck between this and “Live By Night.”
64. “Beasts Of The Southern Wild” (2012)
The magic realism of its premise may sit uncomfortably with some of us, but there’s no denying the effectiveness and the filmmaking verve on display in Benh Zeitlin’s post-Katrina fable, nor Quvenzhane Wallis’ absurdly stellar turn as little Hushpuppy, which feels like it could alter the course of history through sheer force of charm alone. Part social realist critique, part fantasy, part sci-fi, part messiah story, there’s no doubt ‘Beasts’ was a strikingly singular film, and an unusual, laudable pick for a Best Picture nomination.
63. “The Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King” (2003)
Time, and what felt like 27 subsequent ‘Hobbit’ films, has somewhat dulled the memory of Peter Jackson‘s ‘Lord of the Rings‘ trilogy, and it probably doesn’t help that the closer, ‘Return of the King’ was the one that gained the most Academy plaudits despite being the most indulgent of the bunch (see ‘Fellowship’ below). But the round-off of Jackson’s colossally ambitious take on Tolkien’s classic is still a monumental achievement, capping the single greatest rebuke to the idea of the “unfilmable” novel.
62. “Mystic River” (2004)
Sean Penn’s anguished bellow at the end of Clint Eastwood’s adaptation of Dennis Lehane‘s moody, broody “Mystic River” has become something of the Wilhelm Scream of anguished bellows, but it’s no faint praise to say that by the time we get there, the film, which also features very fine performances from Tim Robbins and Kevin Bacon, has earned its most operatic moment. A gloweringly dark tale, it’s among the most depressing films ever to get a BP nod, and in a sea of feelgood prestige pics, that’s an achievement.
61. “The Kids Are All Right” (2010)
Astutely observed family dramas that hit their moment, like “American Beauty” or “The Descendants,” are also the films that can drop off the radar as time passes and mores change. But though Lisa Cholodenko‘s “The Kids Are All Right” has suffered slightly from that phenomenon–and been somewhat supplanted in its discussion of non-traditional family units by subsequent shows and films–it’s still a fresh and funny, genuine movie, with the performances given by powerhouses Annette Bening and Julianne Moore still ranking among their finest.
Ah! great list idea
“Already in some circles, admitting you like Damien Chazelle‘s bittersweet whirlygig musical has become like saying you agree with “Crash“‘s win over “Brokeback Mountain” or think that “Driving Miss Daisy” was, in fact, the best film of 1989. ”
What circles? How can I avoid them?
Find people who generally have correct opinions. There are your circles.
A.K.A. People who agree with you?
If I didn’t think I was correct, why would I even have opinions? And yes the people who agree with me are right.
And anyone who has a different opinion than yours must be wrong.
Yes. That’s true.
Well, at least you agree. It explains why you’re trolling.
Kudos for admitting it though.
I agree with your sentiment because it is correct even though you were being sarcastic. Your sarcasm is misplaced because your actual position on the matter is very wrong.
Me: “You’re really delusional!”
You: “Yes. That’s true.”
That’s it kid! Apology accepted. Go home now.
“And anyone who has a different opinion than yours must be wrong.”
This is the thing that is true. I was responding to that part of your statement.
“You’re really delusional!”
To be honest I didn’t even bother to read this part of your comment. I just read the first sentence, and thought, “yes that is true,” and I wrote it. I can tell you that what I have stated before is not delusional.
“I didn’t even bother to read this part of your comment. I just read the first sentence”
Jumping to the conclusion he wants there to be. That explains the delusion.
This has got to be the dumbest reply i’ve read today!!! Holy shit! How can anyone be so full of it that he cant see how stupid he looks??? You just read the first part and stop there just because you agree? how retarded is that???
Nobody “generally has correct opinions.”
Opinions are subjective. That’s why they’re called opinions. They are not facts.
Especially when it comes to art, you can’t just say somebody’s opinion is wrong. You’re just being arrogant and immature at that point. Especially when he was just joking.
Claiming that people who agree with you are right, just makes you a dick and an extremist.
Well my opinion is that what you wrote is just 100% wrong and that you are actually the extremist for supporting obviously wrong opinions.
Well, given that you’re acting like an idiot, your opinion has 0% value!
Don’t waste your time. He’s just a troll.
You’re lobbing all of these supposedly “subjective” value judgements at me. I thought subjectivity had truth value.
But I thought I was 100% wrong. What happened? I’m right now? LOL!
Also, learn about sarcasm.
Ouch! Apply Cold Water To That Burn! 🙂
No. You are not right, and you are the one that isn’t following my argument, despite your tone. You are incorrect about everything and fantastically arrogant about it too.
Savage!
Avatar is superior to a LOT of the films you have placed above it. Ridiculous.
I disagree, the writing was overly familiar to the point of condescending to the audience. If you take away the 3D you’re basically left with a live action remake of Fern Gully.
I was about to link this article to Facebook to show all my friends why I love The Playlist, then you went and ruined it saying ‘Whiplash’, ‘Capote’, ‘Moneyball’, ‘Black Swan’, ‘Her’ and ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ are better films than ‘Toy Story 3’. Shame on you.
Not a fan of the idea of ranking.
But a good read to see all the undeserving films I forgot where nominated for Best Picture.
Choice of the number one film is the only correct answer.
The top pick more than makes up for the fashionable Tarantino-bashing here 🙂
There W
How can a movie released in 1999 be nominated for an Academy Award in the 21st century? Right, you forgot the 21st century started in 2001
And you forgot that the Oscars are held the year after the release of the movies.
80 of these movies were boring and do not deserve to be talked about ever again. The best movie I saw in the 21st century has been OLDboy.
That’s the prob with expanded best picture category. Too many mediocre films get nominated, it kind of hurts the Oscar’s prestige
This list is bonkers. But a great read
Everybody has a different opinion. Hard to find any movie ranking that matches yours.
But when they do it’s very satisfying!
Yeah, but how often does it happen. I’m trying to say it’s not something you should expect.
lol the 21st century has been excrement when it comes to movies, so far.
This site used to be good at making lists..
You guys are insane
but nice idea
Mad Max: Fury Road over There Will Be Blood and No Country For Old Men? Playlist, you disappoint me. The former was a pleasant surprise in how it blew the roof off the action movie and starred a dominating heroine to become one of the best films of the year, but the latter two are astonishing classics, contributing as much to cinema as the best films of the 1970s (or any era).
Great list. I enjoyed its iconoclasm (despite Spotlight being so high in the list).
Very interesting list and one I largely agree with. Top 3 is perfect though.
How dare you speak ill of Million Dollar Baby!
Didn’t know that movie had fans! 😉
whoever ranked these is nuts…
You don’t seem to like movies very much. Seems like a painful job of having to write about them all the time.
First thought that entered my head.
Yikes. This was bound to be arduous but holy moly did I endure a lot of ouch!’s and red-faced embarrassment for enjoying quite of few of the films placed near the bottom. I was redeemed, however, with Mad Max being at the top. I hope to one day live in a world where that film would have won best picture.
Oh and I did hate Les Miserables so thanks for putting that where it belongs. Talk about arduous.
Why so spiteful and condescending? Who are you to say that whoever likes Moulin Rouge! is wrong? Half of the movies in the top 50 are actually the worst ones – Master and Commander? Michael Clayton? Any movie of David O. Russell?
You guys clearly needed some more space to be able to judge movies more recently with films from…the 90s, with a clear head. Like, if you’re going to come for La La Land “haters” but then mock Moulin Rouge! fans….you just know how ridiculous this article is going to look in a few short years.
I don’t expect to read this lists agreeing with every ranking, nor should I, but the early captions are written with the kind of cloying contrarianism as a “brutally honest Oscar ballot.”
This is a fun read. In agreement esp. w/ most of the movies you ranked at the very bottom.
Birdman over Inglorious Basterds? What are you smoking?
Moneyball is number 21? Seriously? Moneyball? Did Jonah Hill contribute to this list or something?
…
Moneyball?
You guys seriously think Moneyball is better than Munich, Manchester by the Sea, The Departed, The Pianist, The Grand Budapest Hotel, True Grit, Lost in Translation, Master and Commander, Hugo, Inglourious Basterds, Letters from Iwo Jima, Sideways, Gosford Park, The Aviator, Midnight in Paris, Django Unchained, Nebraska, and The Descendants?
Really?
“its valiant attempt to give the story of an aristocrat with a speech impediment life-or-death stakes is pretty daft.” – Ya, but you and everyone else fell for it at the time – didn’t you ?
“Always hated that up-itself plastic bag though.” – sure you did
I didn’t think you could come across more smug and elitist than actual Oscar votess, but this list took the cake. I’m a huge fan of the Oscars in all honesty and while I know not every pick is a winner, this list comes off as petulant Internet cynicism. And seriously, Mad Mad Fury Road as the best nominee of the whole century to date? You, dear sir, have no taste.
Midnight In Paris was Woody Allen’s best film in years and million dollar baby and The Big Short were fantastic movies you guys at the playlist are seriously wrong with some of your lower ranking best picture nominated movies…..
This reviewer has a real problem with that white savior complex in a movie. Reality bites hard on those that are not connected to it. There are many instances where white people have helped blacks and other races become successful. Why be so hateful of those who look to other who are not of their own race for success?
In the Bedroom (2001) for #1. Almost completely forgotten about now, and along with There Will Be Blood (2007), one of the few absolutely perfect adult films I have seen.
While these lists and assessments are interesting and revisionist, I’m always puzzled by how opinions from the same publications vary in tone from year to year. On a particular year, anything by Clint Eastwood is deemed “classic storytelling” and a few years later “overwrought” or “manipulative”.
In what world is The Blind Side better than The Reader? LOL