In an effort to cut off the head and put a stake in the heart of the awards season for a few months, last week saw us running down a few of the Best Picture possibilities for the 2014/2015 Oscars. Namely, the movies that are likely to dominate discussions in the back six of the next twelve months.
Having ticked that off our list, we’re continuing with our annual premature awards predictions, with Best Actor. Last year, we managed to call three of the five early (Benedict Cumberbatch in “The Fifth Estate” came to naught, and Steve Carell in “Foxcatcher” wasn’t released in time to qualify), which we feel isn’t a bad guess for 51 weeks in advance. You can see our predictions for this year’s line-up below. Suggest your own in the comments section, and come back tomorrow for the Best Actress line-up.
The Top 5
Jack O’Connell (“Unbroken”)
If you haven’t heard the name — and you probably should have at this point, as he’s been linked with “Star Wars” and “Fantastic Four,” among others — get used to it, because Jack O’Connell will be everywhere this time next year. We’re fully on board with the young British actor, as you’ll know from our reviews of both “Starred Up“ and “71“ (and our interview with the star), and he does awards-worthy work in both. They’re probably too small to make much awards impact, but luckily, he’s also starring in Angelina Jolie‘s potential Oscar-magnet “Unbroken.” As Olympian-turned-castaway-turned-war-prisoner Louis Zamperini, he’s got a doozy of a role, one that’s likely to dominate the film, and we can certainly attest that he’s got the fierce charisma and all-round chops to elevate it. That he’s pretty much an unknown to most Hollywood eyes at this stage may yet be a stumbling block — the category generally favors established names over newcomers, though you get the occasional Ryan Gosling or Jeremy Renner in the mix. But as long as the movie lives up to expectations, we’re sure O’Connell will get the push to put him in the voters’ minds.
Chadwick Boseman (“Get On Up”)
Another relative newcomer (albeit one who’s already had one big hit, and graced the cover of Vanity Fair), Chadwick Boseman is quickly becoming the king of the biopic. Last year, the 31-year-old played Jackie Robinson in “42,” which didn’t make an impact on the awards race (partly due to an early-year release date), but made a shit-ton of money and helped to put the actor on the map. This time, he might well have a better chance, because Boseman has the lead role of the legendary James Brown in “Get On Up.” Musical biopics often point the way to Oscar noms or wins (see Jamie Foxx in “Ray,” Marion Cotillard in “La Vie En Rose,” or Joaquin Phoenix in “Walk The Line“), and early behind-the-scenes footage suggests that Boseman has pulled off a transformative turn here. And the film comes from Tate Taylor, who took “The Help” to multiple nods, including three acting nominations. The August release is a tough one and the movie will have to fight to not be forgotten like “The Butler,” but for now, Boseman looks pretty good.
Steve Carell (“Foxcatcher”)
The Academy loves a funny man who turns serious, and for that reason alone, Steve Carell‘s been on our radar for a long time for “Foxcatcher.” Director Bennett Miller‘s first two films both earned their stars Best Actor nods (and a win, for Philip Seymour Hoffman in “Capote“), and Carrell’s role is just as potent, as a schizophrenic millionaire whose friendship with a pair of wrestlers (Mark Ruffalo and Channing Tatum) ends in tragedy. Early footage shows “The Office” star nearly unrecognizable (aided by prosthetics, which can always help, as Nicole Kidman would remind us), and sort of terrifying, and that should make him a real threat. The only problem is that, if you’re being literal, Carell’s part is a supporting one, with Tatum the nominal lead in the script. But we suspect that Sony Pictures Classics will be submitting them the other way around.
Benedict Cumberbatch (“The Imitation Game”)
We thought 2013 would be the year of the Cumberbatch: the actor looked to become a big star with “Star Trek Into Darkness,” and had two awards horses with “The Fifth Estate” and “August: Osage County.” Neither of those contenders turned into much, Oscar-wise, after disappointing reviews, but everyone’s favorite actor-who-sounds-like-he’s-from-a-Lewis-Carroll-story has another killer proposition this year playing Alan Turing, the mathematics genius who helped crack the Enigma code and invent the modern computer, only to be hounded by the government for his sexuality, accept chemical castration, and then kill himself (with a poisoned apple, which gave Apple its logo). It’s a big role with lots of notes to play, and there’s more tragedy and anguish to part with than the aloof Assange. And already broken in as an Oscar presenter, the actor is closer to being part of the Academy establishment, at least. Maybe the film will let us down again, but with a Black List-topping script, and “Headhunters” helmer Morten Tyldum directing, there’s a good chance this’ll turn out very well.
Oscar Isaac (“A Most Violent Year”)
There’s no single Oscar miscarriage of justice that annoyed us more this year than Oscar Isaac failing to get a nomination for “Inside Llewyn Davis.” In a year of very fine leading male performances, Isaac gave the very best. Fortunately, Isaac has another shot this year, and it might well give him a better run at it, playing the lead role, as an immigrant trying to expand his family business in the most crime-ridden year in New York history, in J.C. Chandor‘s “A Most Violent Year.” Chandor has had mixed awards success so far, with “Margin Call” nominated for Best Original Screenplay, but Robert Redford missing out for “All Is Lost.” But this project has, you know, dialogue, and while it’s a crime tale, it seems to be aiming for a kind of American-dream-invoking story that’s reminiscent of “The Godfather.” Javier Bardem was linked to the role initially, which along with Chandor’s involvement, should suggest a high-calibre of material, and Isaac certainly has the chops to do something special with it.
The Next 5
Michael Keaton (“Birdman”)
After years in something like the wilderness during the ’00s, Michael Keaton‘s been on the serious comeback trail of late. Small, but well-received roles in “Toy Story 3” and “The Other Guys” led to a renewal of interest in the one-time “Batman” star, and he’s already had a busy 2014, with roles in “RoboCop” and “Need For Speed.” Could the comeback be cemented by an Oscar? Keaton has the lead role in “Birdman,” a new comedy from “Babel” director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, and it’s one that seems to be partly a meta-commentary on his career with the actor playing a faded star, best known for a superhero role, trying to revive his career on Broadway. After a few years where comeback narratives have won out in this category (Colin Firth, Matthew McConaughey), Keaton, who’s never been nominated, has a good story to latch onto, and Inarritu’s landed five Oscar nods for his last three films (including Best Actor for Javier Bardem in “Biutiful,” a much less accessible film than this promises to be). As ever, it’ll depend on how the film turns out, but Keaton could be in the mix.
Eddie Redmayne (“Theory Of Everything”)
Another Young Turk in a year where the veterans mostly look to be sitting proceedings out, Redmayne is an Academy neophyte, beyond his on-stage performance in “Les Miserables” last year, but he’s stranger to awards, having won an Olivier and a Tony for his appearance in “Red.” In his biggest screen role to date, Redmayne takes the lead in this biopic of Stephen Hawking, the legendary theoretical physicist who became one of the world’s most famous scientists, despite suffering from motor neurone disease that left him paralyzed and unable to speak without technological aid. Disability plus an inspirational story often leads to at least a nomination, but Redmayne’s biggest hurdle may be Benedict Cumberbatch (who coincidentally played Hawking in a TV biopic a few years back) — there may only be room for one cheekbones-y young British actor in the final five.
Jeremy Renner (“Kill The Messenger”)
As the only principle cast member of “American Hustle” not to get an Oscar nomination (and having given a performance at least as good as his colleagues’), Jeremy Renner must be feeling a little hard done by from the Academy this year. But the two-time nominee (Best Actor for “The Hurt Locker,” and Best Supporting Actor for “The Town“) probably won’t be licking his wounds for too long, as he’s got a true-life story coming up that seems like it has a lot of potential to return him to the Dolby Theater. Renner has the lead in Michael Cuesta‘s “Kill The Messenger,” playing investigative journalist Gary Webb, who uncovered CIA links to cocaine smuggling by Nicaraguan Contras backed by the Agency. Webb’s reporting, which took many years, was initially discredited, but later proved to be pretty much on the money, but his career was left in tatters, and he later took his own life. It’s a sort of “All The President’s Men” vibe but with a more tragic ending, it seems, and with a promising director (Cuesta’s best known on the big screen for “L.I.E,” but has reinvented himself after helming the “Homeland” pilot) and cast, you can see why Focus have high hopes for it — they just set it for the same October slot that helped them take “Dallas Buyers Club” to Oscar glory. It’ll be execution dependent (the script is from Peter Landesman, who wrote the dire “Parkland“), but if it comes off, Renner will certainly be a contender.
Joaquin Phoenix (“Inherent Vice”)
After a few years out for a fake hip-hop career and the related documentary shenanigans, Joaquin Phoenix has come storming back. Having cut out some of the, uh, filler he was making before his alleged retirement (“Ladder 49,” anyone?), he’s delivered nothing but great performances since his return, with his Oscar-nominated performance in “The Master” being followed by two more crackers, in Spike Jonze‘s “Her” (which in a less competitive year would surely have figured in), and James Gray‘s “The Immigrant.” As such, he’s always worth keeping an eye on, and though the Weinsteins’ treatment of “The Immigrant” suggests that won’t make much awards impact, a reunion with Paul Thomas Anderson on “Inherent Vice” certainly feels like it has potential. Phoenix was a relatively last-minute replacement for Robert Downey Jr on the project, but the chance to see him take on some lighter fare as a pothead P.I. could well pick up another nod if the film appeals to the Academy (though as we’ve said before, we’re not 100% sure it will), despite Phoenix’s refusal to campaign, and stated disdain for awards.
Brendan Gleeson (“Calvary”)
A few years back, Brendan Gleeson picked up a surprise Golden Globe nomination for his hilarious turn in John Michael McDonagh‘s “The Guard,” but couldn’t convert it into further awards traction. But his reunion with McDonagh for the much-lauded Sundance picture “Calvary” could perhaps get further on. A more soulful and slightly less profane picture than its predecessor, Gleeson has received some of the best reviews of his career, and the film seems to be connecting with critics and audiences in a big way, if the reaction at Sundance and Berlin is anything to go by (read our rave review here). Given that he’s been in everything, but has never been Oscar-nominated, Gleeson could well be a contender for that sort of Demian Bichir/Richard Jenkins slot, and Fox Searchlight seem to agree. They unexpectedly picked the film up, partly because, we’re told, that they’re planning a big awards push for Gleeson in particular. There’s still obstacles (the film does start with an unseen man saying “I first tasted semen when I was 7 years old,” which may cause more timid Academy voters to turn it right off) but if critics get behind him, Gleeson could definitely be a possibility.
Honorable Mentions: As ever, this is the most crowded category, and there’s a lot of serious potentials lurking elsewhere too. Many have mentioned Philip Seymour Hoffman‘s last major role in “A Most Wanted Man” as a possibility for a posthumous nod, and he’s said to be terrific in it. But it’s hardly a crowd-pleaser, and the Academy can be difficult with posthumous nominations — if Fox Searchlight couldn’t get James Gandolfini one for “Enough Said” last year, the smaller Roadside Attractions might have an even tougher task on their hands. Meanwhile, this year’s winner Matthew McConaughey will be back in Christopher Nolan‘s “Interstellar.” The film does look like the helmer’s most awards-friendly picture so far, but we suspect it’ll be too soon for the star to crop up again unless it’s another blinding performance.
There’s already buzz for Ralph Fiennes in “Grand Budapest Hotel,” and the actor is brilliant in it, but it’ll be a real feat if it can keep up the momentum for nearly a full year. If the film lands in time, Michael Fassbender could get his second nod for “Macbeth,” but it’s worth noting that it’s decades since someone was nominated for playing a Shakespearean role. It’s not quite as long since a Mike Leigh film picked up Oscar nods, so it might be worth keeping an eye on Timothy Spall in “Mr. Turner,” though it may be more BAFTA territory unless the film wins across-the-board raves.
Al Pacino is on the comeback trail, and has two of his most promising prospects in a long while coming up, in the shape of David Gordon Green‘s “Manglehorn,” and comedy-drama “Imagine,” but both are unknown quantities at this point, so we wouldn’t bet the farm. John Lithgow and Alfred Molina got strong reviews at Sundance for “Love Is Strange,” while further back, James McAvoy also got good notices for “The Disappearance Of Eleanor Rigby,” which the Weinsteins will be putting out at some point this year (hopefully).
In terms of big names, it’s also worth watching Brad Pitt in “Fury“; Christian Bale in “Exodus“; Ben Affleck in “Gone Girl“; Robert Downey Jr in “The Judge“; Jeff Bridges in “The Giver“; Tobey Maguire in “Pawn Sacrifice“; Jonah Hill in “True Story“; Mark Wahlberg in “The Gambler“; Tommy Lee Jones in “The Homesman“; Adam Sandler in “The Cobbler” and Ben Stiller in “While We’re Young.” And for some potential first-time nominees, don’t discount James Corden in “Into The Woods“; Tom Hardy in “Child 44“; John Cusack and/or Paul Dano in Brian Wilson biopic “Love & Mercy“; Gael Garcia Bernal in “Rosewater” and Dane DeHaan as James Dean in “Life,” while there may yet be another campaign to see Andy Serkis‘ performance-capture work recognized, for “Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes.” Any others you think we’ve missed? Let us know in the usual place.
so many terrific actor performances this year, I\’d hate to be a voting member
Without watching all the films it's ot serious to comment.
STEVE CARELL SHOULDN´T WIN
BECAUSE IT WILL LOOK LIKE SANDRA BULLOCK FOR THE BLIND SIDE
MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY SHOULD WIN ANOTHER OSCAR
BECAUSE HE WON FOR DALLAS BUYERS CLUB AND NOW FOR INTERSTELLAR
THE BLIND SIDE=FOXCATCHER
APOLLO 13=INTERSTELLAR
TOP 10
1.- MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY
2.- BEN AFFLECK
3.- BRAD PITT
4.- CHRISTOPH WALTZ
5.- TOMMY LEE JONES
6.- JOAQUIN PHOENIX
7.- CHRISTIAN BALE
8.- BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH
9.- RALPH FIENNES
10.- STEVE CARELL
MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY SHOULD HAVE WON ANOTHER OSCAR
BECAUSE HE WAS A VERY AMAZING IN INTERSTELLAR
STEVE CARELL DOESN´T WIN A OSCAR BECAUSE IS GONNA TO LIKE SANDRA BULLOCK FOR THE BLIND SIDE
BEST ACTOR
BEN AFFLECK FOR GONE GIRL
BRAD PITT FOR FURY
CHRISTOPH WALTZ FOR BIG EYES
TOMMY LEE JONES FOR THE HOMESMAN
MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY FOR INTERSTELLAR
Steve Carell already won this fcking award.
I think the best actor Oscar should definitely go to Ralph Fiennes for grand Budapest hotel. I truly believe that it is his time to win it.
What about John Lloyd Young in Jersey Boys?
Logan Lerman is a self-hating Jew who consistently whitewashes his own grandfatherâs history as a Holocaust refugee, in interviews. So Lerman shouldnât be starring in Fury, a movie about fighting Nazis.
TOP 10 (No order):
– Joaquin Phoenix (Inherent Vice)
– Matthew McConaughey (Interstellar)
– Steve Carrell (Foscatcher)
– Benedict Cumberbacht (The Imitation Game)
– Jack O'Connell (Unbroken)
– Ralph Fiennes (The Grand Budapest Hotel)
– Ben Affleck (Gone Girl)
– Christian Bale (Exodus)
– Brad Pitt (Fury)
– Michael Keaton (Birdman)
Renner is looking good here. I remember reading several of the cast/crew describe his performance as phenomenal, or something similar, last fall. Apparently got some people excited. I didn't know they were aiming for a fall release, so I didn't read much into it then. While I think it's too early for nomination talk, Renner seems like a good one to keep an eye on. He already has several pro-oscar traits in his favor anyway.
Other than that, I would LIKE to see Phoenix, Issac, Spall, and Gleeson. Hopefully they will deliver, and are recognized for it justly if they do.
Turing isn't the basis for the Apple logo. Even a cursory check of the internet would have made that clear: see cnn article from 2011/10/06/opinion/apple-logo.
Top 10 Most Promising Contenders:
Ben Affleck
Christian Bale
Steve Carell
Benedict Cumberbatch
Ralph Fiennes
Philip Seymour Hoffman
Michael Keaton
Matthew McConaughey
Joaquin Phoenix
Jeremy Renner
I think Joaquin Phoenix would have already been nominated for both The Master and Her if he hadn't bad-mouthed the Oscars. If you're a voting Academy member, why would you want to vote for a guy who's already denounced what you're doing?
If the Academy decided to expand the other major categories like they did for Best Picture (which is unlikely) my picks would be:
1. Adam Sandler
2. Joaquin Phoenix
3. Steve Carrell
4. Robert Downey Jr
5. Michael Keaton
6. Al Pacino
7. Chadwick Boseman
8. Christian Bale
9. Tobey Maguire
10. Brad Pitt or Jeff Bridges (can't decide)
Is nobody gonna mention Tom Hardy for Locke?
Does anyone know where I can read a copy of the script for inherent vice or fury? for my own personal enjoyment…
Phoenix and Carell are def. getting noms. Other three not so certain
No love for Michael Peña? Been hearing good things about his role as Cesar Chavez.
Joaquin'll probably deserve a nomination but won't get one, as he did for Her.
Brad Pitt for Fury is a contender at least based on the script and Logan Lerman for supporting – great, intense role for a young actor. Sony obviously has a lot of confidence in the material to position it in mid November. Having read the script, I think it's a wise move.
Seriously underestimating David Ayer's Fury and a potential Brad Pitt Best Actor nom. Read the script which it's gritty and riveting. Ayer wasn't joking when he said he wanted to do something with the WWII genre.Pitt's and Logan Lerman's characters have nearly the same amount of onscreen time with the Lerman character slightly longer but they will probably position the younger actor for the supporting category. WarDaddy is no Aldo Raine.
Brad Pitt for Fury, he is one of the best actors and he will do a great job. As for supporting maybe Logan Lerman is having his chance to get his first nod.
Brad Pitt for Fury, he is one of the best actors and he will do a great job. As for supporting maybe Logan Lerman is having his chance to get his first nod
Brad Pitt for Fury, he is one of the best actor and he will do a great job. As for supporting maybe Logan Lerman is having his chance to get his first nod
Isn't "A Most Violent Year" getting a 2015 premiere???
RDJ and McConaughey should be top contenders
Robert Downey Jr for the Judge???
JK Simmons-Whiplash?
Jack o connell will be the youngest winner ever (If he win). also nominee (except jackie cooper for skippy). Adrien broody who was 29 the most youngest best actor winner now. He deserved it. Jlaw win by his stupid ammature role so why not him. Steve carrell should go for supporting and michael keaton should be nominate. and what about ben foster lance armstrong film?
Robert Pattinson is the lead in LIFE : its a movie a about a photographer roadtrip with James Dean
Nicolas Cage for Joe?
It is a great pity that the 'establishment' did not think of Alan Turing in his great hour of need and even where Churchill abandoned him and saved a traitor. So very sad but unfortunately so very true – http://worldinnovationfoundation.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/the-establishment-makes-amends-but_720.html
Dr David Hill
Chief Executive
World Innovation Foundation
Well, if the Academy had any balls–which we know they don't–James McAvoy would get a nod for 'Filth.' He's stupendous in it.
for Fury, I think Logan Lerman's character is more baity than Brad Pitt's. But he's too young for a best actor nom…
I'm betting on Cumberbatch finally getting some Oscar recognition and Jeremy Renner getting nominated after being unforgivably snubbed this year (HE did deserved a nomination for his work on American Hustle; Cooper and Lawrence shoudn't even had been nominated to begin with, with Adams maybe getting a supporting nomination). And it would be just fun to see Carell getting nominated and winning for supporting.
also i think The Gambler will probley be out in early 2015, like january 2015.
its a nice month for a Mark Wahlberg movie including contraband, broken city & Lone Survivor.
What about Russell Crowe for Noah?
2014 seems to be Kevin Costner's big year with movies like 3 Days to Kill and Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, so he could get nominated again with movies like McFarland or Ivan Reitman's Draft Day
Serkis is supporting but I agree he deserves a nomination, I mean for Christ's sakes there's a difference between motion capture and voice acting!
Sandler deserves a nomination and it's not just Cobbler, but Men, Women, and Children is a possibility as well, Sandler has talent!!!!! Forget Jack and Jill, Grown Ups, That's My Boy, if you would watch movies like Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, Punch Drunk Love, 50 First Dates, Reign Over Me, and Funny People and you would see that the guy CAN make good movies!
There's a serious lack of star presence here. This category has lent itself to movie stars over the last few years, 2013 (McConaughey, Bale, DiCaprio), 2012 (Cooper, Washington, arguably Jackman), 2011 (Pitt and Clooney) so not even having one star in your Top 10 seems kind of foolish to me.
LOL ridiculous list. the Brit/indie bias is showing. Not gonna happen. Next please.
What's up with the underestimation of Fury? Sony's clearly positioning that as an awards contender and has nothing else to push. I've read the script and Pitt has a good part and a lot of goodwill in the industry lately with the work he's done as a producer. I think you guys are going to end up eating crow on that one or else you have something against Ayer/Pitt and are already prepping your pan. Five first time nominees isn't happening, also.
Doesn't that Lance Armstrong biopic come out this year? Could Ben Foster gain some traction for that? He's an amazing actor and always good even when the films themselves are not.
This was my first year watching the oscar race from the beginning and it seemed to be a long line of 'its going to be great, its going to be great, oh dear! its rubbish'. My only feeling at the moment is that the list looks interesting and I am really looking forward to The Imitation Game and Kill the Messenger. This sort of film is hard to get right and with the script the IG probably has the advantage, but from past experience, when it comes to the big final scene, I think Renner is more likely to reduce me to tears than Cumberbatch.
I'd be completely shocked if "The Imitation Game" fails. Potent subject, topnotch cast, acclaimed script, promising director and an award-winning below the line team (William Goldenberg is cutting, fgs) not to mention Weinstein backing it.
On paper, this sounds like a pretty good year.
My early predictions:
Steve Carell – Foxcatcher
Oscar Isaac – A Most Violent Year
Michael Keaton – Birdman
Jack O'Connell – Unbroken
Jeremy Renner – Kill the Messenger
Just missing out:
Ben Affleck – Gone Girl
Christian Bale – Exodus
Gael Garcia Bernal – Rosewood
Chadwick Boseman – Get On Up
James Corden – Into the Woods
Benedict Cumberbatch – The Imitation Game
Robert Downey, Jr. – The Judge
Ralph Fiennes – The Grand Budapest Hotel
Brendan Gleeson – Calvary
Tom Hardy – Child 44 or Animal Rescue/The Drop/ Whatever it's called now
Philip Seymour Hoffman – A Most Wanted Man
Tommy Lee Jones – The Homesman
Joaquin Phoenix – Inherent Vice
Brad Pitt – Fury
Mark Wahlberg – The Gambler
I wouldn't be surprised to see Renner there at all, maybe even take it. Something tells me his action roles have made mainstream audiences forget what a strong contender he is in dramatic films (which could be an advantage); the last time he was the lead in a suspense/drama was The Hurt Locker, and that seemed to work out well. Renner is playing to his strengths here, along with a stellar story, cast, and crew.
Cumberbach I expect to see just because of how juicy the role sounds but won't be sold on the performance until I see it; I'm unsure about Oscar Issac yet, but he certainly carries the heaviest 'snub' vote; and I'm on the fence about Michael Scott. If I stop calling him Michael Scott after the film, then Carell is definitely up for a nom. It's still way too early for this stuff, but last years predictions were pretty good, so officially consider these guys on my radar!
I'd say: Pitt, TLJ, Phoenix and McConaughey are all safe bets… and Isaac is probably getting the 5th spot.
Oli, I think this is the most outrageous premature prediction you've ever offered. I'll be surprised if you get more than 1/5 from your top picks.
Your top five is really, really newcomer-heavy, which is a huge gamble. Safe bet is to include at least one or two veterans. My top five would probably be:
Brad Pitt, Fury (you guys are being incredibly stupid about this)
Joaquin Phoenix, Inherent Vice
Michael Keaton, Birdman
Steve Carell, Foxcatcher OR Benedict Cumberbatch, The Imitation Game
Jack O'Connell, Unbroken OR Chadwick Boseman, Get On Up
Apart from Joaquin nothing there makes me go wow, I think Lithgow, Molina and Timothy Spall could be ones to watch in what seems like a fairly muted year and Fiennes would be a lock in if the film hadn't been released so early. After a couple of competitive years, 2014, in foresight at least, feels kind of dull. As for the Weinstein seal, got a feeling those days are done with, too much meddling and a veering towards the bland and obvious.
I'd put big bucks on the "Batch" winning Best Actor Oscar for The Imitation Game. Weinstein has put his stamp on it, and it's Benedict Cumberbatch's moment.
Where's Christoph Waltz for Big Eyes?
I've read the Foxcatcher script and I wouldn't even call Carrell the lead. Channing Tatum's character is the lead role. Carrell could easily get a supporting nod though, the role is pretty meaty.
my prediction for best actor is defently
Adam Sandler-The Cobbler or men, women & Children
Benedict Cumberbatch-The Imitation Game
Jack O'Connell-Unbroken
Joaquin Phoenix-Inherent Vice
Steve Carell-Foxcatcher
IMO, Steve Carell (Foxcatcher) has the best ODDS on your list to end up showing at the academy awards ceremony next year. Joaquin Phoenix (Inherent Vice) has a good shot too. Jack O'Connell has a good part, but don't know how he is going to handle it, and also AA are not so friendly to "male" newcomers. Chadwick Boseman (Get On Up) could also be a contender, it all depends on his performance. Pitt, Bale, Downey Jr., Bridges, Sandler, Stiller don't look like contenders from this point, considering their roles. Lithgow & Molina look like the real contenders counting on the first reviews of Love is STrane. It would be awesome to see Pacino on the race again. Also Cage has been praised for his performance in JOE, but have no idea if he's going to take any love from the awards.
Miles Teller for Whiplash??
I see Steve Carell for an nomination even though it's too early. I hope Joaquin Phoenix gets in there and Inherent Vice too. PTA is a genius too genius for the Academy, I suppose. But I hope good things for it.
From last year's piece regarding which of Gatsby or WoWS would give Dicaprio a better shot at a nom.
" It's hard to tell at this stage which is the more viable option (we'd lean with 'Gatsby,' but the film's production troubles give us pause), and so we wonder if DiCaprio might end up missing out once again."
Lol.