It’s hard to believe it’s only been five years since Disney‘s blockbuster announcement that the studio was purchasing Lucasfilm. The mouse house has moved swiftly ever since, delivering three new “Star Wars” movies for fans, with much more to come. George Lucas has seen his brainchild passed to new creative voices and filmmakers, however, when the Disney/Lucasfilm deal was first announced, it was his material that was making headlines.
“What we’re buying, along with the overall company, is a pretty extensive and detailed treatment for what would be the next three movies. The [new] trilogy,” Disney CFO Jay Rasulo said in 2012 shortly after the ink was dry.
However, once everyone rolled up their sleeves to start work on what would become “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” Kathleen Kennedy and co. essentially said “Thanks, but no thanks” to Lucas’ vision and embarked down their own path. Where his version might’ve gone we’ll perhaps never know, but some kernels of his idea did seem to survive, as outlined in “Art of Star Wars: The Last Jedi” book (via Slashfilm):
READ MORE: ‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’ Is “A Gangster Movie” Says Paul Bettany
In the book, we learn that one of the first meetings to visualize The Force Awakens happened on January 16, 2013 at Skywalker Ranch with George Lucas himself. Among the pieces presented at the meeting were portraits of an older Luke Skywalker training a new disciple named Kira (later renamed Rey). The idea was that, 30 years after the fall of the Empire, Luke had gone to a dark place and secluded himself in a Jedi temple on a new planet. The paintings show Luke meditating, reassessing his whole life.
Of course, the training of a new Jedi — formerly named Kira, now named Rey — doesn’t happen until the second film, with J.J. Abrams and co. introducing a whole new legion of heroes first. They also turned around the idea of Luke Skywalker leading the new story, and instead position him as a mythic character that is sought out by the new ensemble. Whether or not one approach better served the new saga, we’ll let fans debate in the comments section.
However, here’s an interesting tidbit — the name Kira is still kicking around. Over the summer, it was revealed that the name of Emilia Clarke‘s character in “Han Solo: A Star Wars Story” is, you guessed it, Kira. So maybe there’s still a little bit of Lucas left in these movies.
The person everyone SHOULD have had write this was Marsha Lucas.
Instead we’ve had 20 years of destroying the original trilogy.
Sigh.
Oh my god, that really cheered me up. A whole week of self proclaimed uber nerds ranting NOTMYLUKE, and saying Disney has ruined Star Wars, and it turns out we were going to get brooding hermit Luke anyway. Priceless.
Mark Hamill stated that it wasn’t HIS Luke @ least as far back as the summer! If the man who’s played the character since the (first) film says they took the film in the wrong direction maybe the “Uber nerds” (I’ve never read anyone addressing themselves as such) have a point.
Yeah, but in the article above, Lucas made that pitch back in January 2013, so I guess Mark would be having those reservations regardless, with the man who actually created the character he’s played since the first film, An Uber-Nerd for me is someone who prefaces the discussion with the words “I’m a true Star Wars fan”, like that adds some kind of weigh tto their opinion, they perceive themselves as the pinnacle of fandom, the arbiters of taste, gatekeeprs to what is decided to be good or bad in Star Wars. Now, come on, you must’ve seen some of those around the last few days. 8¬))
Cheers!
Hilarious. The shit fanboys are hollering most about is Lucas gold!
Not hard for me, my pops died right after…finally going to get new star wars and BAM.