James Cameron continues to press on with all four of his unasked-for “Avatar” sequels, determined to build whole new worlds to entice audiences around the globe to return to Pandora and beyond. Yet, for all the fancy, digital window dressing he will use for his upcoming movies, Cameron is less concerned with bringing more characters into the mix. In fact, he’s going to stick to with same villain across all five flicks.
Speaking with Empire, the director revealed that Stephen Lang will earn a steady paycheck as the No Good Military Guy Whose Name I Already Forget, and promises that the actor will bring it the necessary badness required for the part.
READ MORE: Sigourney Weaver Says The ‘Avatar’ Sequels Start Shooting This Fall
“The interesting conceit of the ‘Avatar’ sequels is it’s pretty much the same characters. There are new characters and a lot of new settings and creatures, so I’m taking characters you know and putting them in unfamiliar places and moving them on this greater journey,” Cameron said. “But it’s not a whole bunch of new characters every time. There’s not a new villain every time, which is interesting. Same guy. Same motherfucker through all four movies. He is so good and he just gets better. I know Stephen Lang is gonna knock this out of the park.”
Well, let’s hope that the filmmaker has a clever reason for letting Lang get away each time, because as an audience, we’re going to need a decent reason why our heroes can’t seem to get to him across four more flicks. But according to Cameron, it’s all part of one grand story that’s essentially going to be cut up.
“This is a greater narrative broken up into four complete stories,” he said.
“Avatar 2” opens on December 18, 2020 so you have plenty of time to rewatch “Avatar” and remember what the deal was with Lang’s villain.
“…can’t seem to keep to get to him …” Nice sentence
Umm…wasn’t he killed by Neytiri at the end of the first film?
Clooooooness!!!!
It’s this same cynical “sequels nobody asked for” journalism that predicted the demise of the first “smurf’s ferngully” movie. We’ll see.
Wow – the “writer /reviewer” is a real seasoned “pro” isn’t he ?
No Bias whatsoever – “Unasked -for” ? ” No Good Military Guy Whose Name I Already Forget”
Aren’t a good percentage of ALL movies “unasked-for” ? What is it –
jealousy over a guy who made the 2 biggest movies ever made ? What’s with the barely concealed dislike / hatred ?
Journalism at it’s finest ? Along with the continually dropping level of quality & subject matter in much writing across the Internet. Bad editing. Examples everywhere of inability to spell simple words or understand simple rules of journalism and grammar.