20. Steven Soderbergh
We would make a crack about Steven Soderbergh being the comeback kid, given his supposed retirement back in 2013, but really, he never went away. Since going out with an extraordinary triple bill of “Magic Mike,” a skewering of the American Dream disguised as bachelorette-party entertainment; “Side Effects,” a sly, subversive take on the ’80s erotic thriller; and most amazingly of all, a biopic that was actually good with “Behind The Candelabra,” Soderbergh shot 10 movies’ worth of material across two seasons of “The Knick,” and did the best work of his career in the process. And now, American cinema’s most restless, experimental, and knowledgeable filmmaker is going back to the feature-length form, both with mysterious HBO project “Mosaic,” and with heist comedy “Logan Lucky” with Adam Driver, Channing Tatum and Daniel Craig. And though, as we said, it never felt like he was ever really retiring, God, it’s good to have him back.
19. Bong Joon-Ho
If Korea has the most exciting cinema in the world right now (and between the aformentioned Park Chan-Wook and Kim Jee-woon, plus very different filmmakers like Kim Ki-Duk and Hong Sang-Soo, it might well), Bong Joon-Ho is its most exciting director. Since breaking out with the extraordinary epic police procedural “Memories Of Murder,” he’s tackled genres including the monster movie, the Hitchcockian thriller and the dystopian sci-fi with “The Host,” “Mother” and “Snowpiercer,” and each time turned out masterpieces that no other filmmaker could have pulled off. Each film takes the familiar template and adds subversive humor, indelible characters, unexpected texture and a dash of social realism, resulting in something that ends up feeling entirely fresh. English-language debut “Snowpiercer” had its release botched and never got the audience it deserved, but we hope that’ll change with his latest, “Okja” starring Tilda Swinton and Jake Gyllenhaal, which Netflix will debut.
18. Steve McQueen
There’s still a long way to go, but in future years Steve McQueen’s “12 Years a Slave” winning Best Picture will likely seem a watershed moment not just for its obvious token appeal within an industry noted for its lack of diversity, but because of the type of film it is. Brutal, austere and made with singleminded artistic vision, “Driving Miss Daisy” it is not. But of course, we should have expected as much: McQueen’s previous two films, “Hunger” and “Shame,” which gave career-defining roles to Michael Fassbender, were similarly excoriating, unsentimentalized portraits of men trapped in prisons literal and figurative. The news that his HBO series “Codes of Conduct,” which we were greatly anticipating, will not be airing after all is disappointing, but at least he’ll soon be back on the big screen with “Widows,” a female-fronted heist thriller starring Viola Davis, and it will be fascinating to see how McQueen approaches such a high concept.
17. Ava DuVernay
Actors have become great filmmakers; cinematographer and editors have become great filmmakers; screenwriters have become great filmmakers; even, god help us, critics have become great filmmakers. But Ava DuVernay may be the first great filmmaker to emerge from PR, and if she’s any indication, maybe we should encourage a lot more publicity folk to change careers. DuVernay’s first feature after making the switch, microbudget drama “I Will Follow,” won her a fan in Roger Ebert, but it was follow-up “Middle Of Nowhere” that broke her out wider, winning her Best Director at Sundance. And then came “Selma,” one of the best political films of recent years, a film that looked at Martin Luther King not just as an icon, but as a man and as a politician. She’s already one of the great chroniclers of the African-American experience, something only cemented by her TV show “Queen Sugar,” maybe the best new drama of the fall, and by her imminent documentary “The 13th.” But she won’t be pigeonholed either: Next, she’ll adapt beloved YA sci-fi fantasy “A Wrinkle In Time” for Disney.
16. David Fincher
Somehow, in the aftermath of one of his greatest successes with “Gone Girl,” David Fincher ended up having what’s likely one of the most difficult periods of his career since “Alien3,” with HBO pulling the plug on not just one but two of his projects there. But Fincher’s come back from worse before, and he remains mainstream film’s most subversive and challenging talent when he’s on top form. Not every one of his projects completely lands — we maintain that “Benjamin Button” was underrated by cinephiles, but will acknowledge that “The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo” was bloated and a little hollow. But when he’s on form, and he usually is — proving the perfect partner and counterpoint to Aaron Sorkin with “The Social Network,” sneaking a pitch-black comedy of marriage into the clothes of a pulp thriller with “Gone Girl,” making an undisputed masterpiece with “Zodiac” — he’s one of the best. He’ll be back next year with new Netflix series “Mindhunter,” and it can’t come soon enough.
15. Pedro Almodóvar
It’s hard to do justice in brief to all the life and drama and color and emotion that comprises the work of Spain’s most consistently inventive and distinctive auteur, but seeing as we can’t just describe his filmography in a string of fire emojis, let’s describe it in microcosm. In one of his masterpieces “Volver” (which ranks alongside “Women On The Verge Of A Nervous Breakdown,” “All About My Mother” and “Talk to Her” as his greatest work, though everything he’s ever done bar misfire “I’m So Excited” is [fire emoji]), there’s a single shot that encapsulates his peculiar genius, and it is a simple overhead shot of Penélope Cruz chopping tomatoes. The rambunctious joie de vivre on display in this moment combines food and sex and a powerful femininity into one delectable, emblematic image. Almodóvar’s films are intricate celebrations of complex womanhood as an elemental force, and though they can verge on the grotesque, they are never less than wholly, magnificently human.
14. Jane Campion
The first woman to win the Palme d’Or, and the second to pick up a Best Director nomination, Jane Campion is undoubtedly a pioneer for female filmmakers, but to describe her as only that would be to do her an enormous disservice. A regular at Cannes even before her first feature, “Sweetie,” debuted, the New Zealander’s gone on to be a filmmaker of enormous emotional sensitivity and acute detail, be it in homegrown drama “An Angel At My Table;” the unexpected Oscar hit “The Piano;” or more recent period drama “Bright Star,” a completely gorgeous, utterly devastating film that never quite got the attention it deserved. And “Top Of The Lake” (soon to get a second season), her TV series, showcased some of the best work of her career. She tells stories that would be overlooked by male filmmakers, which makes her one of the most vital voices out there, but you suspect she could tackle virtually any material and make it utterly compelling.
13. Asghar Farhadi
Cinema in general, and Iranian film in particular, suffered a huge loss with the recent death of master Abbas Kiarostami, but if part of the measure of any legend is the filmmaking he inspires and lays groundwork for, Kiarostami’s legacy is assured because, in large part, of Asghar Farhadi. He came to major prominence after the international breakthrough of his engrossing humanist masterpiece “A Separation,” but Farhadi’s prior titles, especially “Fireworks Wednesday” and “About Elly,” prove just how assured a filmmaker he was long before his Best Foreign Film Oscar. Creating vastly absorbing and deeply relatable human dramas that are both culturally specific and utterly universal, his subsequent films “The Past” and this year’s Cannes title “The Salesman” do not quite attain the dizzying heights of his very best work, and yet they’re both still extraordinary. That tells you all you need to know about the brilliance of Farhadi, perhaps our era’s greatest, most incandescently empathetic chronicler of human relationships.
12. Alfonso Cuarón
The Playlist has had a collective crush on Alfonso Cuarón since ’round about the time when, tacking against the current and having already made two Hollywood films, “A Little Princess” and “Great Expectations” (both solid but hardly spectacular), he went back home to Mexico and made the brilliant “Y Tu Mamá También.” But our crush blossomed into full-on obsession after he followed up best-in-series Harry Potter movie ‘Prisoner of Azkaban‘ with his peerless, brilliantly shot sci-fi masterpiece “Children Of Men.” It took seven years and a little space doodle called “Gravity” before the rest of the world, or at least the Academy, caught up to us, but since then, the news that he is not channeling his Best Director success into one of the big-budget tentpoles he was offered in the aftermath, but again going back to Mexico to shoot a smaller-scale Spanish-language drama, only makes us love him more. Alfonso Cuarón, will you marry us?
11. Yorgos Lanthimos
This list bristles with filmmakers who have delivered influential classics that create entire mini-movements. But amid this august crowd of visionary auteurs, Greek Weird Wave pioneer Yorgos Lanthimos stands apart, with a voice and a vision that defies imitation. “Dogtooth” was surely one of the most distinctive films of all time, and if follow-up “Alps” didn’t quite connect in the same way, he made good with last year’s epic yet intimate, bifurcated, alternate-universe mindfuck “The Lobster.” A loopy, scabrous yet oddly moving investigation into the social pressures of relationships, it featured a career-best Colin Farrell heading up an eclectic ensemble. His next film, “The Killing Of A Sacred Deer” will reteam them and add Nicole Kidman and Alicia Silverstone to the mix for what is sure to be another defiantly uncategorizable, twistedly smart slice of dream logic. You do you, Yorgos Lanthimos, because God knows, nobody else would even know where to begin.
When I saw Linklater in 93rd place, I stopped reading. You have to be kidding.
Yeah, Linklater is easily top15 for me.
agreed, its silly. he’s top 10-15. pure nonsense at 93
Um, no.
dynamite reply
Thank you.
right? the playlist crew always ruin the lists with their rankings. Mess.
Mrs. Jessica Kiang, I am a long time reader of your critical reviews of films, and, in general, I recognize that you have a «high taste» and a powerful prose to explain the «things of cinema». I admire you and I follow in general your views on the films that you analyze, qualify and quantify. But this time, the exercise you proposed to do, ranking the 100 best current film directors, goes beyond all limits of reason. In addition to not explain the criteria you use to rank the film directors, a task that would be logically impossible, you don´t realize the aesthetic absurdity of your exercise. To give you a comparison, could you hierarchize or rank the painters of the Italian Renaissance, or the painters of Dutch Baroque period? I think you could not, I think it would be an exercise doomed to failure. Mrs. Jessica Kiang I beg you to not continue with this exercise and recognize, humbly, before your readers that what you have done was no more nor less than an absurd, capricious and arbitrary hobby.
lol
lol (2)
Refn’s best movie wouldn’t exist without “Thief” and yet he’s way higher than Michael Mann.
It’s too late now but I think an alphabetical order would be better than this. I know it’s just a game but I can’t stand watching Ang Lee, of all people, in a lower position than someone like Miguel Gomes or Andrea Arnold, who haven’t managed to break out of the festival circle and probably never will. People still talk about movies like Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Lust Caution and Icestorm. Fish Tank? Not so much.
Fish Tank was rather mediocre.
refn’s wildly overrated
and in this list he’s got better position then QT,Linklater,herzog and many others.
Kelly Reichardt’s first film wasn’t Old Joy but a Florida -set movie called River Of Grass, which I actually think is one of her best movies. There’s a new restoration of it out this year and I’d strongly recommend people to track it down!
Let me guess Paul Thomas Anderson will be in the Top Ten for some reason. I love his old stuff but after Master and Vice film buffs need to re evaluate if he is actually that good.
For me, The Master is his best film.
Wow really?
probably 4th for me. “magnolia” and “there will be blood” his best
Absolutely. I love all of his films, though. The Master gets better and better everytime I rewatch it.
I did this on my own in February-i only included 15.
Top 10
-Iñárritu
-Cuaron
-Wes Anderson
-Nolan
-Malick
-Linklater
-Coen
-Fincher
-PT Anderson
– Tarantino
Honorable mention
-Dardenne
-McQueen
-Haneke
-Russell
-Scorsese
HHAHAHAHA tarantino at first and honorable mention for Scosese? Get fk are here.
great argument here
Study
still no argument from you. just laughing and insults with nothing to say. empty
I feel like this should have been 2 different lists: A Greatest and a Most Exciting
i disagree with much of the list but love that you’re doing it. and it’s perfect timing as it’s kind of slow as you mention. i kind of love the “There are those who consider Andrew Dominik’s elegiac anti-western, “The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford” the best film of the new century, and those who are wrong about movies.” comment. haha. i’ve got it as my #3-5 film of the 21st century. great work here.
Greatly enjoyed the list. I don’t care so much about the order, I’m more interested in discovering directors that are unknown to me. And there are many. If even a fraction of those are as good as the ones on the list I do know, it is going to be a busy winter.
Alfonso Cuaron directed A Little Princess, not Secret Garden.
You are quite right, thank you for noticing that slip — corrected.
Cuaron would never direct a movie with a protagonist that annoying.
I was hoping to see one of my favs Derek Cianfrance……but great list nonetheless!! 🙂
This is such a typical jerkoff film school list of directors. Like typical PTA, Fincher, Scorsese and the ridiculously overrated Glazer. Leaving out Bennett Miller and JA Bayona and Mira Nair (who all make consistently great films) is a joke and then you see Linklater is 93. This list was probably made by people who enjoyed American Hustle.
i like bennett miller’s films but he and nair and even bayona seem to be directors who make good films rather than great directors. that’s a key distinction. the people at the top of this list should both make great films and be auteurs. Miller would be on my top 100 but his imprint on a film isn’t the same as wes or PT anderson or even those like Glazer, QT, Sofia Coppola, etc.
I am excited for whatever world Ridley Scott want to take me
PTA being one is ridiculous. I mean come on.
Nah.
The Coens, Nolan, Tarantino, Linklater all deserve to be above him and that just American directors. The Master and Inherent Vice are terrible.
Yeah, no. I’d put him on equal grounds with The Coens, and Malick for American directors. But Nolan and Linklater don’t have anything close to the films of Anderson in their oeuvre. Hell, Linklater have several films that I would consider below average. Nolan has about three in that hover around that rating. The Master and Inherent Vice are fantastic, especially, The Master.
The Master and Inherent Vice definitely aren’t terrible. Difficult, cerebral, whatever, sure. But terrible?
They were both met with rave critical reviews (and mixed audience reactions) and as the years have progressed, they’ve only grown in their stature. Look no further than BBC’s Top 100 list that came out a month or two ago. Inherent Vice and The Master (and There Will Be Blood at #2) all made the list.
I’m not saying these lists are scripture, but they do indicate that the critical consensus around these two films in particular is very strong and there are many many pieces around the internet exploring the complexity of those films.
I get that people are tired of seeing him ranked so highly but I also think he’s undeniably one of our greatest and most challenging filmmakers out there.
I would agree with you The Master is getting a cult following but do you think that is happening with Inherent Vice?
I don’t think so from what i’ve seen. but as p-dub mentions it was on the BBC list. i think it will fade over the years. i just don’t think it’s as visually interesting as the rest of his work
That’s absolutely correct. I mean I don’t like The Master at all but at least it has some pretty shots. There are no good shots in Inherent Vice.
What are you talking about? It’s gorgeous. I was actually lukewarm to it the first time. But it’s like a Coen Brothers film. It get funnier each time you watch it.
You’re just talkin’ crazy! There’s a 70MM print floating around rep houses that you should check out if you ever get the chance.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw the opening image of the beach, with the gorgeous light and grain on the image, followed by Joanna Newsom glowing with the light of the sun beaming through her hair as in closeup while she narrates. My jaw dropped.
As he gets older, Anderson seems to have taken more and more cues for the classic Hollywood directors, favoring mediums and composition over frenetic camera movement. There’s an argument to be made that he could have directed it in a more “FUN” way like Boogie Nights, but I am happy with how he went instead. The compositions are simple, but there are grace notes everywhere; whether that’s the lighting or color, the subtle camera movements, or absurd background details.
Inherent Vice is a difficult film. The plot is purposely convoluted (but is easy to follow basically once you know everyones names.) It’s probably intellectually more satisfying than emotionally. It’s also a story that feels like things should come together somehow or be more clearly connected, but often don’t (though they are all thematically linked and loop around and bounce off each other throughout) on a pure plot level.
I totally get why people dismiss it as just a weird misfire on first viewing. Yet I keep insisting that people watch it a couple more times. It works as a rich exploration of the changing era and death of a movements dreams, a pulpy noir, a slapstick comedy, and a melancholy look at love and the way it’s destined to break. I think it’s an absolute masterpiece.
Sorry. I started typing and just started nerding the hell out.
good stuff here.
No Zack Snyder on this list? Can you name a director that captures the essence of the epic with his erotic touch and classical iconography? Every frame is a painting when it comes to Snyder. He has mastered the visual language of cinema and he brings it to bear on the epic and the intimate.
He filmed WATCHMEN which studios had been befuddled by for decades. He is one of the most excitign and prolific directors in Hollywood with similarities to Stanley Kubrick and many of the same criticisms that Kubrick received when people did appreciate his talent.
Zack Snyder should be in the art department where he belongs. Guillermo and a few other should follow him there.
synder is a hack. not sure he’d be on my list of 200
On what planet are Danny Boyle, David Cronenberg and Whit Stillman fresh faces?
This article/list is titled wrong.
Anyone who thinks Intolerable Cruelty is a blip in a filmography shouldn’t be making this list.
It is a blip in the Coens career..
Nah, that would be The Ladykillers. IC is one of their funniest films and a great homage to screwball comedies that stands with some of the greats.
It’s personal taste but I just don’t think IC is funny. For me, that’s what really kills the film. Visually I’m not very excited by it, it’s some of their weaker characters, and there’s very little to hold onto once it’s over.
The Ladykillers also suffers from that same feeling of emptiness. I understand why it’s dismissed, but for me, I still find the film very funny. It is certainly slight and definitely seems like an odd note in their filmography, but I have to admit it makes me laugh a lot. Whether it is Tom Hanks doing just about anything, imagining the Coen’s writing Marlon Wayan’s dialogue, a kick ass gospel soundtrack, or just some of the profoundly strange tonal decisions that were made on the film.
Both films have issues, but thankfully they were couched between two masterpieces like The Man Who Wasn’t There and No Country for Old Men. It was a weird time in the careers (they’d produced several flops previously and were more open to being for hire for studios at the time) and I’m glad they’ve found an amazing artistic groove that they seem to have been riding ever since.
blake is right here
Thank you for including a plethora of female talent! Exciting times in the world of indie film
Haneke’s not in the Top Ten. You have got to be kidding. You’ll look back on this list in ten, twenty years and laugh at yourselves for that.
again- thanks for doing this list- disagree with much but it was lots of fun to read through each day… baumbach and sorrentino are glaring omissions … and this is an honest question- not trolling- where is david o russell? i can’t find him-
hateful eight was tone deaf, hollow and empty? You cucks who write this shit are fucking losers lmao.
Just like Spike Lee, you morons are mad that a white man can make a better movie about racial issues.
Yes, your list isn’t skewed in any way, is it ?
When reading lists like this, especially from Playlist I tend not to care so much about the rankings as I do about what you have to say about each filmmaker. There’s no right list or wrong list but the fact that you guys are even taking the time to put together a list like this is greatly appreciated. Sure I would rank certain filmmakers higher or lower but I also appreciate that there are some filmmakers on this list I’m not familiar with and that it’s a completely international list. Great work guys (but seriously, Linklater should have been higher ranked ;))
I have a soft spot in my heart for Stoker… Sorry, but it’s wonderfully Baroque in imagery and well-acted with a delicious wickedness and weird sensibility. If I didn’t know Park Chan-wook had directed it, I’d have guessed it was a terrific Tim Burton movie (with half the silliness that can mar some his work).
Jeez, what an awful list. So forcefully “diversed” and in the same time shamelessly Americanocentric. Unbelievable ridiculous pick that you definitely cannot expect from the undoubtedly professionals who write for playlist
STFU…America pretty much is the film industry.
Brazilian directors out!!!!!!!!!
Walter Salles???? Fernando Meirelles????? José Padilha??????
Typical feminist propaganda.
+ Kim Ki Duk, Baz Luhrmann…
Both Roman Polansky and Woody Allen are absent here. That choice doesn’t seem purely innocent though there’s certainly a chance that it is.
After I posted this I read the blurb on Zelig in the mockumentary list which explains your thoughts on modern Allen as having “interchangeable sameness”. That’s fair though Allen’s sameness is so refreshingly different from what everyone else is doing that I find that very forgivable. I won’t dwell on Polansky since he’s not the same caliber of director as Allen anyways.
What about Sean Baker? How can you not be excited about him? What is wrong with you?
Nolan should be #1 by a mile
this list is retarded at best