30. Andrew Dominik
There are those who consider Andrew Dominik’s elegiac anti-western, “The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford” the best film of the new century, and those who are wrong about movies. Ok, fine, just kidding but also not really — after a muted initial reception, it is only recently getting the recognition it always merited. It didn’t quite come out of nowhere: Dominik’s much-less-polished 2000 debut “Chopper” displayed a lot of promise and a career-making turn from Eric Bana; while his third feature, “Killing Them Softly,” didn’t quite attain the heights of his second. But in case we were losing faith, along comes this year’s “One More Time With Feeling,” which may be a music documentary (covering the recording of the new Nick Cave album “Skeleton Tree“) but is also one of the most profoundly moving films of the year, and an immensely inventive and beautiful 3D filmmaking showcase to boot.
29. Lucrecia Martel
Great though 2016 has been for festival programming, it has been a year of serial disappointment in terms of one particular title: Lucrecia Martel’s “Zama.” Now due to bow in 2017, we hope it’s the film that will see the Argentinian director become known to audiences outside the critical circles she’s already conquered, starting with debut “La Ciénaga” back in 2002, building through “The Holy Girl” in 2004, up to 2008’s Cannes title “The Headless Woman.” The last of those really bowled us over (we placed it at 6 on our Best Foreign Language Films of the Century list). An ambiguous, mysterious, yet crisply composed portrait of gradual mental disintegration, that also works as pointed commentary on the class divisions in Argentinian society and the challenges facing women of a certain age, it’s a masterclass in directorial control and deep subjectivity which seems a thrilling counterpoint to the sprawling canvas of the long-gestating adaptation “Zama.”
28. Michael Haneke
The two-time Cannes-winning Austrian master may never have made an out-and-out horror film (indeed, he’s in general disdainfully removed from the very idea of genre), but that doesn’t mean Michael Haneke doesn’t absolutely terrify us. And on occasion, his chilly, austere intellectualism, while never less than diamond-cut in its brilliance, can verge on the scornful as with the deeply didactic “Funny Games,” which often feels less like a lesson than a punishment for the viewer. But most of the time his hardness, his unflinchingly steely edge, his subzero lack of sentimentality simply means his films cut deeper than almost anyone else’s, whether it’s the eerie parable of “The White Ribbon;” the twisted psychosexual drama of “The Piano Teacher;” or the utterly genius, deeply troubling “Hidden,” which lives on long after it ends as a kind of unscratchable itch in the mind. His next film “Happy End” (100% guaranteed to be an ironic title) is due in 2017, which gives us a little time to mentally regroup after having been shredded by his last, the Oscar-winning “Amour.”
27. Lynne Ramsay
For a minute, we were worried that Lynne Ramsay might never make a film again. Three years ago, the director of “Ratcatcher,” “Morvern Callar” and “We Need To Talk About Kevin” quit Western “Jane Got A Gun” on the eve of production, with producers putting blame for the blow-up squarely on her shoulders. It’s the kind of incident that could have ended a career, but with the film finally arriving in utterly defanged form, it felt like a vindication for Ramsay, and it feels only appropriate that she started shooting a new film this summer. A sort of social/magic realist, Ramsay is a master of sound and vision, weaving a beguiling style whether she’s tackling gritty kitchen-sink coming-of-age as with her debut, an utterly singular travelogue/character study with ‘Callar,’ or a wrenching study of parenting with ‘Kevin.’ Next, she’s going genre, adapting Jonathan Ames’ neo-noir novella “You Were Never Really Here” with Joaquin Phoenix in the lead.
26. Shane Carruth
A century into the medium, it’s rare for a director to produce something that’s truly and completely original in film. So far, Shane Carruth’s done it twice, with two films, very different from each other, but each equally dazzling. Debut “Primer” was made on a shoestring, but was one of the most intellectually stimulating puzzle-boxes ever made, looping its time-travel conceit in on itself over and over and over again and posing some fascinating existential questions along the way. Follow-up “Upstream Color,” nearly a decade later, was similarly distinctive, but was led by the heart rather than the head, a bizarre, poetic, almost abstracted sort of horror-movie/romance hybrid that made you respond on an almost instinctive level. They were so different from each other that you wouldn’t have necessarily thought they came from the same filmmaker, except that they were each so different from everything else out there. Word’s been quiet for a while on his next movie, all-star, big-budget high-seas adventure “The Modern Ocean,” but there’s no project we want to see more.
25. Steven Spielberg
It’s weird to find Steven Spielberg, still the most famous filmmaker in the world, in the position of being underrated. And yet that’s where we are: The director’s most recent films, whether awards-y pics like “War Horse” or “Bridge Of Spies,” or more escapist fare like “The Adventures Of Tintin” or “The BFG,” have had mildly underwhelming responses from audiences and cinephiles alike. It’s likely that we’re so used to the man behind “Jaws,” “Raiders Of The Lost Ark,” “Schindler’s List” et. al., being so good, and making it so effortless, that the novelty has worn off, but take any of the movies he made in this decade and you’ll find shots, sequences or performances that no one else could have pulled off, and wholes that are rather more interesting than they might appear. Yeah, we’re not thrilled he’s doing “Ready Player One” next, but we’re sure even that will once again remind us that he’s the master, and the old dog continues to pull off all kinds of new tricks.
24. Christopher Nolan
If Spielberg’s no longer Mr. Bulletproof in the way he once was, Christopher Nolan might be the man who’s inherited that mantle — for the last decade, everything he’s touched turned to gold, and he’s just about the only person who could turn a World War II movie starring mostly unknowns into one of the major movie events of 2017 (with his next film, “Dunkirk”). To some, he’s a chilly filmmaker who uses blunt blockbuster instruments, but to us, he’s someone always capable of surprising, be it the morality play of “The Dark Knight;” building a James Bond film on a well of deep sorrow with “Inception;” giving the superhero movie a David Lean sweep with “The Dark Knight Rises;” or making his most personal and strangest film as a space opera with the flawed, totally fascinating “Interstellar.” The canvases might have gotten bigger, but Nolan’s still the same man who made “Following” and “Memento,” without having changed a single thing about his work.
23. Lars Von Trier
His rather played-out bad-boy rep can sometimes obscure the much simpler and more important fact of Lars Von Trier’s exceptional filmmaking talent. Whether operating within the self-imposed austerity of Dogme 95 with “Breaking The Waves;” experimenting with Brechtian staging in “Dogville;” or playing and provoking in equal measure in his more recent, more florid and atmospheric “Depression Trilogy” (“Antichrist,” “Melancholia,” “Nymphomaniac“), what makes Von Trier so significant a figure is not his tendency to rather self-defeatingly rattle cages but the way he seems to put everything — his very soul — into every single film he makes. The results are unpredictable and often confounding (his Cannes-winning “Dancer In The Dark,” for example) but never less than pure: sincere depictions of the landscape of Von Trier’s mind at the time, that vast place, full of wit and grief and questions lurking in dark places. His next, serial-killer story “The House That Jack Built” is due in 2018.
22. Wong Kar-Wai
In 2000, Wong Kar-wai made quite possibly the single most beautiful film of all time (“In The Mood For Love,” which came in at no. 5 on our Best Foreign Films of the Century list) and it’s tempting to regard his filmography as leading up to and away from that point. But though it is a thrilling entry point (featuring sublime photography from regular collaborator Christopher Doyle and starring talismanic presence Tony Leung), Wong’s 10-feature catalogue shows many different phases of growth and experimentation. The intoxicating textures of ‘Mood’ (and lesser follow-up “2046“) came after his episodic gay romance “Happy Together,” which occupies a brasher register, while “Chungking Express” feels like the apotheosis of his more freewheeling, spontaneous impulses. More recent work has perhaps not quite reached those heights — English-language debut “My Blueberry Nights” was a misfire — but with his next project being an 18-part online series, it seems Wong is back experimenting again and we cannot wait.
21. Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Good things come to those who wait. That’s what Hou Hsiao-Hsien proved with “The Assassin,” a film that had been in the works for decades, and actively in production for several years before its release last year. Since the 1980s, the Taiwanese director has been one of Asia’s most acclaimed directors, his meticulous, slow-burn, almost pastoral filmmaking shining through with masterpieces like “City Of Sadness,” “Millennium Mambo” and “Three Times,” as well as his French-language debut “Flight Of The Red Balloon.” But if anyone had forgotten his talents in the eight years while he was away, they were swiftly reminded thanks to his last film, which took his very particular style and put it in the context of the martial-arts film. Those looking purely for action might have come away frustrated, but everyone else found an exquisitely beautiful film where virtually every frame could take your breath away. There’s no news yet on his next project, but hopefully it’ll come together faster, because we need more Hou in our lives.
When I saw Linklater in 93rd place, I stopped reading. You have to be kidding.
Yeah, Linklater is easily top15 for me.
agreed, its silly. he’s top 10-15. pure nonsense at 93
Um, no.
dynamite reply
Thank you.
right? the playlist crew always ruin the lists with their rankings. Mess.
Mrs. Jessica Kiang, I am a long time reader of your critical reviews of films, and, in general, I recognize that you have a «high taste» and a powerful prose to explain the «things of cinema». I admire you and I follow in general your views on the films that you analyze, qualify and quantify. But this time, the exercise you proposed to do, ranking the 100 best current film directors, goes beyond all limits of reason. In addition to not explain the criteria you use to rank the film directors, a task that would be logically impossible, you don´t realize the aesthetic absurdity of your exercise. To give you a comparison, could you hierarchize or rank the painters of the Italian Renaissance, or the painters of Dutch Baroque period? I think you could not, I think it would be an exercise doomed to failure. Mrs. Jessica Kiang I beg you to not continue with this exercise and recognize, humbly, before your readers that what you have done was no more nor less than an absurd, capricious and arbitrary hobby.
lol
lol (2)
Refn’s best movie wouldn’t exist without “Thief” and yet he’s way higher than Michael Mann.
It’s too late now but I think an alphabetical order would be better than this. I know it’s just a game but I can’t stand watching Ang Lee, of all people, in a lower position than someone like Miguel Gomes or Andrea Arnold, who haven’t managed to break out of the festival circle and probably never will. People still talk about movies like Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Lust Caution and Icestorm. Fish Tank? Not so much.
Fish Tank was rather mediocre.
refn’s wildly overrated
and in this list he’s got better position then QT,Linklater,herzog and many others.
Kelly Reichardt’s first film wasn’t Old Joy but a Florida -set movie called River Of Grass, which I actually think is one of her best movies. There’s a new restoration of it out this year and I’d strongly recommend people to track it down!
Let me guess Paul Thomas Anderson will be in the Top Ten for some reason. I love his old stuff but after Master and Vice film buffs need to re evaluate if he is actually that good.
For me, The Master is his best film.
Wow really?
probably 4th for me. “magnolia” and “there will be blood” his best
Absolutely. I love all of his films, though. The Master gets better and better everytime I rewatch it.
I did this on my own in February-i only included 15.
Top 10
-Iñárritu
-Cuaron
-Wes Anderson
-Nolan
-Malick
-Linklater
-Coen
-Fincher
-PT Anderson
– Tarantino
Honorable mention
-Dardenne
-McQueen
-Haneke
-Russell
-Scorsese
HHAHAHAHA tarantino at first and honorable mention for Scosese? Get fk are here.
great argument here
Study
still no argument from you. just laughing and insults with nothing to say. empty
I feel like this should have been 2 different lists: A Greatest and a Most Exciting
i disagree with much of the list but love that you’re doing it. and it’s perfect timing as it’s kind of slow as you mention. i kind of love the “There are those who consider Andrew Dominik’s elegiac anti-western, “The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford” the best film of the new century, and those who are wrong about movies.” comment. haha. i’ve got it as my #3-5 film of the 21st century. great work here.
Greatly enjoyed the list. I don’t care so much about the order, I’m more interested in discovering directors that are unknown to me. And there are many. If even a fraction of those are as good as the ones on the list I do know, it is going to be a busy winter.
Alfonso Cuaron directed A Little Princess, not Secret Garden.
You are quite right, thank you for noticing that slip — corrected.
Cuaron would never direct a movie with a protagonist that annoying.
I was hoping to see one of my favs Derek Cianfrance……but great list nonetheless!! 🙂
This is such a typical jerkoff film school list of directors. Like typical PTA, Fincher, Scorsese and the ridiculously overrated Glazer. Leaving out Bennett Miller and JA Bayona and Mira Nair (who all make consistently great films) is a joke and then you see Linklater is 93. This list was probably made by people who enjoyed American Hustle.
i like bennett miller’s films but he and nair and even bayona seem to be directors who make good films rather than great directors. that’s a key distinction. the people at the top of this list should both make great films and be auteurs. Miller would be on my top 100 but his imprint on a film isn’t the same as wes or PT anderson or even those like Glazer, QT, Sofia Coppola, etc.
I am excited for whatever world Ridley Scott want to take me
PTA being one is ridiculous. I mean come on.
Nah.
The Coens, Nolan, Tarantino, Linklater all deserve to be above him and that just American directors. The Master and Inherent Vice are terrible.
Yeah, no. I’d put him on equal grounds with The Coens, and Malick for American directors. But Nolan and Linklater don’t have anything close to the films of Anderson in their oeuvre. Hell, Linklater have several films that I would consider below average. Nolan has about three in that hover around that rating. The Master and Inherent Vice are fantastic, especially, The Master.
The Master and Inherent Vice definitely aren’t terrible. Difficult, cerebral, whatever, sure. But terrible?
They were both met with rave critical reviews (and mixed audience reactions) and as the years have progressed, they’ve only grown in their stature. Look no further than BBC’s Top 100 list that came out a month or two ago. Inherent Vice and The Master (and There Will Be Blood at #2) all made the list.
I’m not saying these lists are scripture, but they do indicate that the critical consensus around these two films in particular is very strong and there are many many pieces around the internet exploring the complexity of those films.
I get that people are tired of seeing him ranked so highly but I also think he’s undeniably one of our greatest and most challenging filmmakers out there.
I would agree with you The Master is getting a cult following but do you think that is happening with Inherent Vice?
I don’t think so from what i’ve seen. but as p-dub mentions it was on the BBC list. i think it will fade over the years. i just don’t think it’s as visually interesting as the rest of his work
That’s absolutely correct. I mean I don’t like The Master at all but at least it has some pretty shots. There are no good shots in Inherent Vice.
What are you talking about? It’s gorgeous. I was actually lukewarm to it the first time. But it’s like a Coen Brothers film. It get funnier each time you watch it.
You’re just talkin’ crazy! There’s a 70MM print floating around rep houses that you should check out if you ever get the chance.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw the opening image of the beach, with the gorgeous light and grain on the image, followed by Joanna Newsom glowing with the light of the sun beaming through her hair as in closeup while she narrates. My jaw dropped.
As he gets older, Anderson seems to have taken more and more cues for the classic Hollywood directors, favoring mediums and composition over frenetic camera movement. There’s an argument to be made that he could have directed it in a more “FUN” way like Boogie Nights, but I am happy with how he went instead. The compositions are simple, but there are grace notes everywhere; whether that’s the lighting or color, the subtle camera movements, or absurd background details.
Inherent Vice is a difficult film. The plot is purposely convoluted (but is easy to follow basically once you know everyones names.) It’s probably intellectually more satisfying than emotionally. It’s also a story that feels like things should come together somehow or be more clearly connected, but often don’t (though they are all thematically linked and loop around and bounce off each other throughout) on a pure plot level.
I totally get why people dismiss it as just a weird misfire on first viewing. Yet I keep insisting that people watch it a couple more times. It works as a rich exploration of the changing era and death of a movements dreams, a pulpy noir, a slapstick comedy, and a melancholy look at love and the way it’s destined to break. I think it’s an absolute masterpiece.
Sorry. I started typing and just started nerding the hell out.
good stuff here.
No Zack Snyder on this list? Can you name a director that captures the essence of the epic with his erotic touch and classical iconography? Every frame is a painting when it comes to Snyder. He has mastered the visual language of cinema and he brings it to bear on the epic and the intimate.
He filmed WATCHMEN which studios had been befuddled by for decades. He is one of the most excitign and prolific directors in Hollywood with similarities to Stanley Kubrick and many of the same criticisms that Kubrick received when people did appreciate his talent.
Zack Snyder should be in the art department where he belongs. Guillermo and a few other should follow him there.
synder is a hack. not sure he’d be on my list of 200
On what planet are Danny Boyle, David Cronenberg and Whit Stillman fresh faces?
This article/list is titled wrong.
Anyone who thinks Intolerable Cruelty is a blip in a filmography shouldn’t be making this list.
It is a blip in the Coens career..
Nah, that would be The Ladykillers. IC is one of their funniest films and a great homage to screwball comedies that stands with some of the greats.
It’s personal taste but I just don’t think IC is funny. For me, that’s what really kills the film. Visually I’m not very excited by it, it’s some of their weaker characters, and there’s very little to hold onto once it’s over.
The Ladykillers also suffers from that same feeling of emptiness. I understand why it’s dismissed, but for me, I still find the film very funny. It is certainly slight and definitely seems like an odd note in their filmography, but I have to admit it makes me laugh a lot. Whether it is Tom Hanks doing just about anything, imagining the Coen’s writing Marlon Wayan’s dialogue, a kick ass gospel soundtrack, or just some of the profoundly strange tonal decisions that were made on the film.
Both films have issues, but thankfully they were couched between two masterpieces like The Man Who Wasn’t There and No Country for Old Men. It was a weird time in the careers (they’d produced several flops previously and were more open to being for hire for studios at the time) and I’m glad they’ve found an amazing artistic groove that they seem to have been riding ever since.
blake is right here
Thank you for including a plethora of female talent! Exciting times in the world of indie film
Haneke’s not in the Top Ten. You have got to be kidding. You’ll look back on this list in ten, twenty years and laugh at yourselves for that.
again- thanks for doing this list- disagree with much but it was lots of fun to read through each day… baumbach and sorrentino are glaring omissions … and this is an honest question- not trolling- where is david o russell? i can’t find him-
hateful eight was tone deaf, hollow and empty? You cucks who write this shit are fucking losers lmao.
Just like Spike Lee, you morons are mad that a white man can make a better movie about racial issues.
Yes, your list isn’t skewed in any way, is it ?
When reading lists like this, especially from Playlist I tend not to care so much about the rankings as I do about what you have to say about each filmmaker. There’s no right list or wrong list but the fact that you guys are even taking the time to put together a list like this is greatly appreciated. Sure I would rank certain filmmakers higher or lower but I also appreciate that there are some filmmakers on this list I’m not familiar with and that it’s a completely international list. Great work guys (but seriously, Linklater should have been higher ranked ;))
I have a soft spot in my heart for Stoker… Sorry, but it’s wonderfully Baroque in imagery and well-acted with a delicious wickedness and weird sensibility. If I didn’t know Park Chan-wook had directed it, I’d have guessed it was a terrific Tim Burton movie (with half the silliness that can mar some his work).
Jeez, what an awful list. So forcefully “diversed” and in the same time shamelessly Americanocentric. Unbelievable ridiculous pick that you definitely cannot expect from the undoubtedly professionals who write for playlist
STFU…America pretty much is the film industry.
Brazilian directors out!!!!!!!!!
Walter Salles???? Fernando Meirelles????? José Padilha??????
Typical feminist propaganda.
+ Kim Ki Duk, Baz Luhrmann…
Both Roman Polansky and Woody Allen are absent here. That choice doesn’t seem purely innocent though there’s certainly a chance that it is.
After I posted this I read the blurb on Zelig in the mockumentary list which explains your thoughts on modern Allen as having “interchangeable sameness”. That’s fair though Allen’s sameness is so refreshingly different from what everyone else is doing that I find that very forgivable. I won’t dwell on Polansky since he’s not the same caliber of director as Allen anyways.
What about Sean Baker? How can you not be excited about him? What is wrong with you?
Nolan should be #1 by a mile
this list is retarded at best