It is, how shall we put this, not a huge week for new releases, and the movie news cycle seems to be taking a little bit of a breather in between TIFF and the New York Film Festival. So we thought we’d take this opportunity to attempt a more ambitious, wide-ranging week-long feature, and one that we’ve been batting around internally for a while now — our official and definitive and unimpeachably correct (!!) ranking of the 100 currently working filmmakers we’re most excited about.
As you can see from the title (“Best And Most Exciting”) we’ve built in a kind of warning right up top that this is, of course, extremely subjective, and even among ourselves the sliding scale between “best” and “most exciting” caused quite a lot of comradely debate and a little bit of blue murder. And that’s the way we wanted it, really because while the “best” side of things takes into account legacy and historical track record, “most exciting” lets us argue as we cycle in much newer, and relatively untested talents, who perhaps have more noise than signal right now, but nonetheless are a big part of what gets us out of bed in the morning. And “working” means we aren’t beholden to directors who may have done stunning work in their day but have either gone substantially off the boil or have been dormant for a while. Essentially, we get to do whatever we please.
That three-way balance is really what makes this list exciting to us, and where we get to make it, for want of an adjective that’s actually a word, Playlisty. Which also means there is 100% no way you’re going to agree with it all, so feel free to bawl us out in the comments, though seeing as we’re running 25 entries per day you might want to wait till the list is complete, because maybe your fave will show up later on, and then you’ll look silly. In any case, we’ve already had our fun compiling and we have to say, we really love it, and hope that you do too, even if you do disagree.
100. Luca Guadagnino
You could make an argument that Italian cinema is the great underperformer of Europe — a filmmaking nation capable of great heights, but whose local industry has often gone through phases of failing to break out on the world stage (the 1980s and 1990s were a particularly bleak period). Since the turn of the new century, though, an exciting new wave of Italian filmmakers have arrived like Paolo Sorrentino and Matteo Garrone, but our favorite might be Luca Guadagnino. The Palermo native first turned heads with his erotic coming-of-age film “Melissa P” in 2005, followed by the utterly gorgeous Tilda Swinton vehicle “I Am Love” in 2009, a luxurious, lavish but also still fiercely intelligent piece of work that felt like seeing a great piece of European theater or opera. His follow-up, this year’s “A Bigger Splash,” was a joyously grubby B-movie in arthouse clothes (we mean that as a compliment), and an indicator that perhaps he’s just getting started.
99. Joachim Trier
With his his second film, “Oslo, August 31st” following on from his supremely assured debut “Reprise,” Norwegian director Trier established his place among the vanguard of an increasingly thriving Nordic cinema scene, and found the best expression to date of his style and voice: restrained, novelistic, richly and rewardingly human. His most recent film and first in English, “Louder Than Bombs” (once again co-written by Eskil Vogt who made his own directorial debut with the shimmery and wonderful “Blind” in 2014) played in Cannes in 2015 to far more muted reaction and though we remain among its staunchest defenders, there’s no doubt that the extraordinary tides of minutely observed feeling that ebb and flow through ‘Oslo’ are not quite as seamlessly summoned. But Trier remains a beautifully accomplished filmmaker, tirelessly investigating self-identity and memory with an unshowy intelligence that seems to enlarge in scope from one film to the next.
98. Marielle Heller
Few filmmakers on this list are as early in their careers as Marielle Heller, who has only a single movie to her name at this point. But when that one film is “Diary Of A Teenage Girl,” as assured and skillful a directorial debut as we’ve seen in a long time, attention demands to be paid. The former actress beautifully adapted Phoebe Gloeckner’s graphic novel memoir of coming of age in 1970s San Francisco and an age-inappropriate relationship with her mother’s boyfriend, bringing authenticity, visual imagination and an obvious skill with actors (Bel Powley is great, but so were Kristen Wiig and Alexander Skarsgard) to what could have been a very familiar story. Stellar work on episodes of “Transparent” and “Casual” have shown she’s no flash in the pan, and she’s got a great line-up of projects in development: an adaptation of documentary “The Case Against 8,” true-life tale “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” starring Melissa McCarthy, and J.J. Abrams-produced supernatural romance “Kolma” with Daisy Ridley.
97. Lisa Cholodenko
With Peak TV luring many talents who don’t fit the white male profile traditionally repped by Hollywood, there are a few instances where we’ve included filmmakers who work on the small screen too. Take Lisa Cholodenko, whose case seems among the most stark in terms of sexism (it’s hard to believe a male writer/director with a critical hit of the order of 2010’s Best Picture-nominated “The Kids Are All Right” would not have had another film greenlit since) and whose work for television is part of the general blurring of boundaries between the media. So as well as director-for-hire episiodes of “Hung,” “Six Feet Under” and “The L Word,” her four-part miniseries “Olive Kitteridge,” starring Frances McDormand, was one of the best shows of 2015 and in shape and quality easily sits alongside the best of her big-screen work (which includes feature debut “High Art” and the underseen “Cavedweller,” as well as her aforementioned “blockbuster indie”).
96. Taika Waititi
We have to confess that we slept on New Zealand’s Taika Waititi for too long. His feature debut “Eagle Vs. Shark” (which came after his Oscar-nominated short “Two Cars, One Night”) was a bit twee (and yet sour) for our tastes, and as such, we never watched his follow-up, “Boy.” But the cult buzz on his vampire mockumentary “What We Do In The Shadows” a couple of years back got too much to ignore, and once we caught up with the film, we realized how wrong we’d been to ignore him. The film’s one of the most consistently funny comedies of the last few years, but done with heart and an understanding of the horror genre and some visual flair too (unusual for the mock-doc genre). This year’s “Hunt For The Wilderpeople” was even better: a rousing, utterly charming adventure that showed he could play on a big canvas. And that canvas just got a lot bigger: next up, “Thor: Ragnarok.”
95. Haifaa Al-Mansour
There are a lot of bad-news trends that we report on throughout the year, so it’s truly exciting when we get to be sunny-side-up, and the emergence of Saudi Arabia’s first female filmmaker, Haifaa Al-Mansour is one such time. Making an international splash not just because of that catchy epithet, but also because of the evocative simplicity and engaging warmth of her feature debut “Wadjda” in 2012 (also the first feature-length film to be shot entirely in her native country), Al-Mansour was already something of a controversial figure in Saudi filmmaking for her award-winning 45-min documentary “Women Without Shadows.” It would have been easy for “Wadjda” to have been a token critical hit, but gratifyingly, its strength has led to bigger things: Al-Mansour’s next movie is “A Storm in the Stars,” in which a who’s-who of rising young stars (Elle Fanning, Douglas Booth, Bel Powley, Tom Sturridge, Maisie Williams) bring the story of “Frankenstein” author Mary Shelley to life.
94. Gina Prince-Bythewood
For too long, Gina Prince-Bythewood has gone undervalued. To some extent, she’s still undervalued: it’s a straight-up fact that not enough people have seen her work so far. But we think her time’s about to come, and finally a larger audience will be waking up to how brilliant she is. Prince-Bythewood broke through with two movies in 2000: tender, well-acted HBO movie “Disappearing Acts,” and seminal, finely honed love story “Love & Basketball.” Her most recent movie, “Beyond The Lights,” was a fine reminder of her talents: detailing the romance between a Rihanna-style pop star struggling with fame (an astonishing Gugu Mbatha-Raw) and an ambitious young cop (Nate Parker), it was smart, moving and should have been a huge hit, but was mishandled by its distributor. Bigger things await, though: Prince-Bythewood is behind upcoming Fox series “Shots Fired,” about police shootings, and will reteam with Mbatha-Raw for an adaptation of Roxane Gay’s novel “An Untamed State” at Fox Searchlight.
93. Richard Linklater
Always more Austin than Hollywood even when making studio movies, a perpetual outsider was embraced by the establishment when “Boyhood” became an unlikely awards phenomenon two years ago. And that kind of recognition for Richard Linklater has been long overdue. Like many filmmakers who are prolific and unconstrained by genre, Linklater can be patchy — he had a rough patch in the mid-00s with “Bad News Bears,” “Fast Food Nation” and “Me & Orson Welles.” But he’s been on the run of his life recently with disarming curio “Bernie,” devastating trilogy closer “Before Midnight,” the epic, yet deeply intimate “Boyhood,” and winning, if minor “Dazed & Confused” follow-up “Everybody Wants Some.” They’re quite different, but united by a very particular Linklater-ishness: an easy-going charm, a deep humanity, a deceptive incisiveness. He’s pleasingly unpredictable too, as his next move, a sequel to Hal Ashby’s “The Last Detail” with Bryan Cranston, Steve Carell and Laurence Fishburne, proves once again.
92. Ana Lily Amirpour
There’s a good chance Ana Lily Amirpour would have featured in a higher position on this list had her sophomore feature “The Bad Batch” not left our Venice reviewer so wholly nonplussed. Still, although it might not have been the satisfying home-run we’d hoped for, there’s little doubt ‘Batch’ is an intriguingly uncompromised expression of Amirpour’s ineffably hip sensibility which means that even those who find it a letdown after her deliciously doomy, swoony debut “A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night” must be plenty interested in where she goes next. Even this early on in her career, Amirpour has a terrific eye (in collaboration with her regular DP Lyle Vincent), an ear for a sublimely off-kilter yet deeply appropriate soundtrack cue, and a finger-on-pulse coolness, which means that her magpie-like pick-and-mix approach to genre and aesthetic will always yield something idiosyncratic, however successful or unsuccessful it turns out to be.
91. Lucile Hadžihalilović
All these years, we were debating whether Gaspar Noé was a genius or an empty provocateur, and it turns out that we should really have been paying attention to his wife and sometime collaborator Lucile Hadžihalilović, whose two strange, beguiling features to date show her to be the real talent in that particular filimmaking power couple. After a series of shorts, and producing and editing Noé’s breakthrough “I Stand Alone,” Hadžihalilović made her feature debut with 2004’s “Innocence,” about a macabre boarding school. Over a decade later, she returned with “Evolution,” following children on a mysterious island tended to by a group of women. The two make perfect companion pieces to each: utterly beautiful, dreamlike not-quite-horror films influenced by Lynch and Victor Erice but still entirely their own thing, movies with little interest in following traditional narrative but nevertheless worming their way entirely into your psyche. We just hope we don’t have to wait another decade for her next film.
When I saw Linklater in 93rd place, I stopped reading. You have to be kidding.
Yeah, Linklater is easily top15 for me.
agreed, its silly. he’s top 10-15. pure nonsense at 93
Um, no.
dynamite reply
Thank you.
right? the playlist crew always ruin the lists with their rankings. Mess.
Mrs. Jessica Kiang, I am a long time reader of your critical reviews of films, and, in general, I recognize that you have a «high taste» and a powerful prose to explain the «things of cinema». I admire you and I follow in general your views on the films that you analyze, qualify and quantify. But this time, the exercise you proposed to do, ranking the 100 best current film directors, goes beyond all limits of reason. In addition to not explain the criteria you use to rank the film directors, a task that would be logically impossible, you don´t realize the aesthetic absurdity of your exercise. To give you a comparison, could you hierarchize or rank the painters of the Italian Renaissance, or the painters of Dutch Baroque period? I think you could not, I think it would be an exercise doomed to failure. Mrs. Jessica Kiang I beg you to not continue with this exercise and recognize, humbly, before your readers that what you have done was no more nor less than an absurd, capricious and arbitrary hobby.
lol
lol (2)
Refn’s best movie wouldn’t exist without “Thief” and yet he’s way higher than Michael Mann.
It’s too late now but I think an alphabetical order would be better than this. I know it’s just a game but I can’t stand watching Ang Lee, of all people, in a lower position than someone like Miguel Gomes or Andrea Arnold, who haven’t managed to break out of the festival circle and probably never will. People still talk about movies like Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Lust Caution and Icestorm. Fish Tank? Not so much.
Fish Tank was rather mediocre.
refn’s wildly overrated
and in this list he’s got better position then QT,Linklater,herzog and many others.
Kelly Reichardt’s first film wasn’t Old Joy but a Florida -set movie called River Of Grass, which I actually think is one of her best movies. There’s a new restoration of it out this year and I’d strongly recommend people to track it down!
Let me guess Paul Thomas Anderson will be in the Top Ten for some reason. I love his old stuff but after Master and Vice film buffs need to re evaluate if he is actually that good.
For me, The Master is his best film.
Wow really?
probably 4th for me. “magnolia” and “there will be blood” his best
Absolutely. I love all of his films, though. The Master gets better and better everytime I rewatch it.
I did this on my own in February-i only included 15.
Top 10
-Iñárritu
-Cuaron
-Wes Anderson
-Nolan
-Malick
-Linklater
-Coen
-Fincher
-PT Anderson
– Tarantino
Honorable mention
-Dardenne
-McQueen
-Haneke
-Russell
-Scorsese
HHAHAHAHA tarantino at first and honorable mention for Scosese? Get fk are here.
great argument here
Study
still no argument from you. just laughing and insults with nothing to say. empty
I feel like this should have been 2 different lists: A Greatest and a Most Exciting
i disagree with much of the list but love that you’re doing it. and it’s perfect timing as it’s kind of slow as you mention. i kind of love the “There are those who consider Andrew Dominik’s elegiac anti-western, “The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford” the best film of the new century, and those who are wrong about movies.” comment. haha. i’ve got it as my #3-5 film of the 21st century. great work here.
Greatly enjoyed the list. I don’t care so much about the order, I’m more interested in discovering directors that are unknown to me. And there are many. If even a fraction of those are as good as the ones on the list I do know, it is going to be a busy winter.
Alfonso Cuaron directed A Little Princess, not Secret Garden.
You are quite right, thank you for noticing that slip — corrected.
Cuaron would never direct a movie with a protagonist that annoying.
I was hoping to see one of my favs Derek Cianfrance……but great list nonetheless!! 🙂
This is such a typical jerkoff film school list of directors. Like typical PTA, Fincher, Scorsese and the ridiculously overrated Glazer. Leaving out Bennett Miller and JA Bayona and Mira Nair (who all make consistently great films) is a joke and then you see Linklater is 93. This list was probably made by people who enjoyed American Hustle.
i like bennett miller’s films but he and nair and even bayona seem to be directors who make good films rather than great directors. that’s a key distinction. the people at the top of this list should both make great films and be auteurs. Miller would be on my top 100 but his imprint on a film isn’t the same as wes or PT anderson or even those like Glazer, QT, Sofia Coppola, etc.
I am excited for whatever world Ridley Scott want to take me
PTA being one is ridiculous. I mean come on.
Nah.
The Coens, Nolan, Tarantino, Linklater all deserve to be above him and that just American directors. The Master and Inherent Vice are terrible.
Yeah, no. I’d put him on equal grounds with The Coens, and Malick for American directors. But Nolan and Linklater don’t have anything close to the films of Anderson in their oeuvre. Hell, Linklater have several films that I would consider below average. Nolan has about three in that hover around that rating. The Master and Inherent Vice are fantastic, especially, The Master.
The Master and Inherent Vice definitely aren’t terrible. Difficult, cerebral, whatever, sure. But terrible?
They were both met with rave critical reviews (and mixed audience reactions) and as the years have progressed, they’ve only grown in their stature. Look no further than BBC’s Top 100 list that came out a month or two ago. Inherent Vice and The Master (and There Will Be Blood at #2) all made the list.
I’m not saying these lists are scripture, but they do indicate that the critical consensus around these two films in particular is very strong and there are many many pieces around the internet exploring the complexity of those films.
I get that people are tired of seeing him ranked so highly but I also think he’s undeniably one of our greatest and most challenging filmmakers out there.
I would agree with you The Master is getting a cult following but do you think that is happening with Inherent Vice?
I don’t think so from what i’ve seen. but as p-dub mentions it was on the BBC list. i think it will fade over the years. i just don’t think it’s as visually interesting as the rest of his work
That’s absolutely correct. I mean I don’t like The Master at all but at least it has some pretty shots. There are no good shots in Inherent Vice.
What are you talking about? It’s gorgeous. I was actually lukewarm to it the first time. But it’s like a Coen Brothers film. It get funnier each time you watch it.
You’re just talkin’ crazy! There’s a 70MM print floating around rep houses that you should check out if you ever get the chance.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw the opening image of the beach, with the gorgeous light and grain on the image, followed by Joanna Newsom glowing with the light of the sun beaming through her hair as in closeup while she narrates. My jaw dropped.
As he gets older, Anderson seems to have taken more and more cues for the classic Hollywood directors, favoring mediums and composition over frenetic camera movement. There’s an argument to be made that he could have directed it in a more “FUN” way like Boogie Nights, but I am happy with how he went instead. The compositions are simple, but there are grace notes everywhere; whether that’s the lighting or color, the subtle camera movements, or absurd background details.
Inherent Vice is a difficult film. The plot is purposely convoluted (but is easy to follow basically once you know everyones names.) It’s probably intellectually more satisfying than emotionally. It’s also a story that feels like things should come together somehow or be more clearly connected, but often don’t (though they are all thematically linked and loop around and bounce off each other throughout) on a pure plot level.
I totally get why people dismiss it as just a weird misfire on first viewing. Yet I keep insisting that people watch it a couple more times. It works as a rich exploration of the changing era and death of a movements dreams, a pulpy noir, a slapstick comedy, and a melancholy look at love and the way it’s destined to break. I think it’s an absolute masterpiece.
Sorry. I started typing and just started nerding the hell out.
good stuff here.
No Zack Snyder on this list? Can you name a director that captures the essence of the epic with his erotic touch and classical iconography? Every frame is a painting when it comes to Snyder. He has mastered the visual language of cinema and he brings it to bear on the epic and the intimate.
He filmed WATCHMEN which studios had been befuddled by for decades. He is one of the most excitign and prolific directors in Hollywood with similarities to Stanley Kubrick and many of the same criticisms that Kubrick received when people did appreciate his talent.
Zack Snyder should be in the art department where he belongs. Guillermo and a few other should follow him there.
synder is a hack. not sure he’d be on my list of 200
On what planet are Danny Boyle, David Cronenberg and Whit Stillman fresh faces?
This article/list is titled wrong.
Anyone who thinks Intolerable Cruelty is a blip in a filmography shouldn’t be making this list.
It is a blip in the Coens career..
Nah, that would be The Ladykillers. IC is one of their funniest films and a great homage to screwball comedies that stands with some of the greats.
It’s personal taste but I just don’t think IC is funny. For me, that’s what really kills the film. Visually I’m not very excited by it, it’s some of their weaker characters, and there’s very little to hold onto once it’s over.
The Ladykillers also suffers from that same feeling of emptiness. I understand why it’s dismissed, but for me, I still find the film very funny. It is certainly slight and definitely seems like an odd note in their filmography, but I have to admit it makes me laugh a lot. Whether it is Tom Hanks doing just about anything, imagining the Coen’s writing Marlon Wayan’s dialogue, a kick ass gospel soundtrack, or just some of the profoundly strange tonal decisions that were made on the film.
Both films have issues, but thankfully they were couched between two masterpieces like The Man Who Wasn’t There and No Country for Old Men. It was a weird time in the careers (they’d produced several flops previously and were more open to being for hire for studios at the time) and I’m glad they’ve found an amazing artistic groove that they seem to have been riding ever since.
blake is right here
Thank you for including a plethora of female talent! Exciting times in the world of indie film
Haneke’s not in the Top Ten. You have got to be kidding. You’ll look back on this list in ten, twenty years and laugh at yourselves for that.
again- thanks for doing this list- disagree with much but it was lots of fun to read through each day… baumbach and sorrentino are glaring omissions … and this is an honest question- not trolling- where is david o russell? i can’t find him-
hateful eight was tone deaf, hollow and empty? You cucks who write this shit are fucking losers lmao.
Just like Spike Lee, you morons are mad that a white man can make a better movie about racial issues.
Yes, your list isn’t skewed in any way, is it ?
When reading lists like this, especially from Playlist I tend not to care so much about the rankings as I do about what you have to say about each filmmaker. There’s no right list or wrong list but the fact that you guys are even taking the time to put together a list like this is greatly appreciated. Sure I would rank certain filmmakers higher or lower but I also appreciate that there are some filmmakers on this list I’m not familiar with and that it’s a completely international list. Great work guys (but seriously, Linklater should have been higher ranked ;))
I have a soft spot in my heart for Stoker… Sorry, but it’s wonderfully Baroque in imagery and well-acted with a delicious wickedness and weird sensibility. If I didn’t know Park Chan-wook had directed it, I’d have guessed it was a terrific Tim Burton movie (with half the silliness that can mar some his work).
Jeez, what an awful list. So forcefully “diversed” and in the same time shamelessly Americanocentric. Unbelievable ridiculous pick that you definitely cannot expect from the undoubtedly professionals who write for playlist
STFU…America pretty much is the film industry.
Brazilian directors out!!!!!!!!!
Walter Salles???? Fernando Meirelles????? José Padilha??????
Typical feminist propaganda.
+ Kim Ki Duk, Baz Luhrmann…
Both Roman Polansky and Woody Allen are absent here. That choice doesn’t seem purely innocent though there’s certainly a chance that it is.
After I posted this I read the blurb on Zelig in the mockumentary list which explains your thoughts on modern Allen as having “interchangeable sameness”. That’s fair though Allen’s sameness is so refreshingly different from what everyone else is doing that I find that very forgivable. I won’t dwell on Polansky since he’s not the same caliber of director as Allen anyways.
What about Sean Baker? How can you not be excited about him? What is wrong with you?
Nolan should be #1 by a mile
this list is retarded at best